<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The advertising career of Audrey Hepburn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jackyan.com/blog/2010/01/audrey-hepburn-advertises-luckygoldstar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jackyan.com/blog/2010/01/audrey-hepburn-advertises-luckygoldstar/</link>
	<description>Branding, leadership, typography, marketing and the media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:25:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Yan</title>
		<link>http://jackyan.com/blog/2010/01/audrey-hepburn-advertises-luckygoldstar/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackyan.com/blog/?p=158#comment-148</guid>
		<description>The tea one was just awful. I read about it in design magazines at the time and thought the idea was cool, but now I have seen the execution of it, I think it’s terrible. You are right, Colleen: her personality is irrelevant to it.
&#160; &#160;I can see a bit more of the connection in the &#64257;rst one for Lucky–Goldstar: they are saying their cell is about as fancy as jewellery displayed at Tiffany’s, but I still do not like the TVC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tea one was just awful. I read about it in design magazines at the time and thought the idea was cool, but now I have seen the execution of it, I think it’s terrible. You are right, Colleen: her personality is irrelevant to it.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp;I can see a bit more of the connection in the &#64257;rst one for Lucky–Goldstar: they are saying their cell is about as fancy as jewellery displayed at Tiffany’s, but I still do not like the TVC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://jackyan.com/blog/2010/01/audrey-hepburn-advertises-luckygoldstar/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackyan.com/blog/?p=158#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Both ads above, I would describe more as unrelated to the products.  What did Audrey&#039;s presence add to theme? Confusion.  Any pretty face could have been used in these ads.  There is nothing about her and her personality that was brought into these ads that makes any sense.  Very bizarre to watch, actually, especially when they are not in English.  Interesting to see foreign commercials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both ads above, I would describe more as unrelated to the products.  What did Audrey&#8217;s presence add to theme? Confusion.  Any pretty face could have been used in these ads.  There is nothing about her and her personality that was brought into these ads that makes any sense.  Very bizarre to watch, actually, especially when they are not in English.  Interesting to see foreign commercials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://jackyan.com/blog/2010/01/audrey-hepburn-advertises-luckygoldstar/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 14:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackyan.com/blog/?p=158#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Yes, tacky, I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, tacky, I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
