Jack Yan
Global  |  Leadership  |  Experience  |  Media  |  Videos
Blog  |  Contact
 
  You can’t beat Wellington. Follow me on Mastodon Follow me on Twitter Check out my Instagram account Follow me on Drivetribe Follow me on Tumblr Follow me on Linkedin Follow me on Weibo Join my page on Facebook Follow me on Pinterest Subscribe to my blog’s RSS feed  

 

Share this page




Quick links


Surf to the online edition of Lucire





Add feeds



Get this blog via email
Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner



 

The Persuader

My personal blog, started in 2006.



« | »

11.09.2016

The big difference with the internet of the ’90s: it served the many, not the few

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “The big difference with the internet of the ’90s: it served the many, not the few”.


5 Responses to ‘The big difference with the internet of the ’90s: it served the many, not the few’

  1. Yes, Jack, that sounds very Utopian – but what’s in it for the people with MONEY who want power and influence? Not a damned thing – they’re already getting exactly what they want.

    You have to tackle the demand side before the supply side will follow. I’m just not seeing that side of the equation changing any more than with the “War on Drugs.” And if there’s absolutely no incentive to change course, supply will just redouble their efforts to keep doing what’s proven to work.

    Now – what we need are the same propagandists that took on Big Tobacco in the U.S. They’ve actually made a noticeable difference in consumer attitudes and behavior, and you wouldn’t have thought it possible – going up against the tobacco industry, would you?

  2. Jack Yan says:

    Excellent point, Holly: if we can make the demand for independent voices strong by using the techniques of the anti-tobacco crowd, we could be on to something.

  3. […] Facebook et al are the establishment now, and, as such, they prop up others in the establishment. Google News was once meritorious, now it favours big media names ahead of independents. This dangerously drowns out those independent voices, and credible writers and viewpoints can get […]

  4. […] to debase it. Civility and respect should be the order of the day. If these tools hadn’t been used by the few to line their pockets at the expense of the many—or, for that matter, the democratic processes of their nations—wouldn’t we be in a better […]

  5. […] stability or the enforcement of T&Cs, but a whole reconsideration of its raison d’être to serve the masses. Honesty and transparency can save it—two things that I haven’t seen Facebook exhibit much of […]

Leave a reply