That was a very interesting 30 hours. I found out about the âWellywoodâ sign yesterday afternoon, through Twitter, and Tweeted to say I hated it. Little did I know then that there was a huge Facebook groupâ6,000 strong at the time of writingâwhere Wellingtonians were making their voices known.
And when I got there to Facebook, I was inspired.
While my opponents were still talking hot air, I decided to act for the good of the city. I was inspired by one comment on the larger anti-sign Facebook group, which asked: surely someone holds the copyright?
First stop: the Hollywood Sign Trust. If anyone knew who owned the sign, it would be them.
I received a very nice reply from Betsy Isroelit of the Trust at what must have been very early hours in California, to say that she had referred it to the correct parties.
By the time I got up today, I had an email waiting from Global Icons, LLC, which, with the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce, owns the original Hollywood signâs intellectual property. Global Icons, from what I understand, looks after this side of things for the Chamber. And would I please send them the artistâs impression of what the sign would look like?
And that kicked it off. I mentioned this to Rachel Morton at TV3 news before I was interviewed, and she took the initiative by contacting the CEO of the Chamber for comment immediately. It turns out that he did not know that the matter was already brewing in California, but he does now. Rachel tells me that he then put the Chamberâs lawyers on to the case. Thatâs two for us, nil for Mayor Prendergast and the airport.
All it took was the creativity of Wellingtonians to show something I have said from day one.
You know, creativity? The thing that this sign does not represent, and makes fun of?
And all it took were everyday Wellingtonians collaborating. I was inspired by the person on the Facebook group. And if I hadnât approached the Trust and Global Icons, I wouldnât have mentioned it to Rachel. And if Rachel hadnât called the CEO, Global Icons would probably be going it alone. It doesnât matter who gets the credit, because the credit is, really, everyoneâs. The result should hopefully be that this horrible sign does not go up because people were prepared to actâwhether by making their voice known on Facebook, or making some phone calls.
People power, not corporates, not Ă©lites, gets things done. And that includes this yearâs mayoral election.
Archive for the ‘technology’ category
The ‘Wellywood’ sign: people power gets things done
10.03.2010Tags: Aotearoa, California, copyright, democracy, destination branding, Facebook, Hollywood, intellectual property, Jack Yan, law, mayoralty, media, New Zealand, people power, trade mark, USA, Wellington, Whanganui-a-Tara
Posted in New Zealand, Wellington, culture, internet, media, politics, technology | 2 Comments »
Wellington needs free wifi and jobs, not a council that goes nuts with spending
02.03.2010
Funny how a media article can inspire you to send out a release, especially when youâre a ratepayer and you wonder if our City Council of Ă©lites understands how hard it was for us to make that money. In todayâs case, it was Lindsay Sheltonâs Scoop Wellington op-ed about Wellington City Council going nuts with its spending. Lindsay highlighted not only a $350,000 sculpture for the World Cupâmoney which I reckon we could use to boost the central cityâs wifi coverageâbut Dave Burgessâs report in The Dominion Post that WCC spends six times as much as Poriruaâs council on food and drink.
Iâm not sure how we can justify those sorts of numbers, but I do have an aim to balance the budget if elected.
As I wrote today, if we can grow our creative and technological clusters in Wellingtonâand get free wifi up and running (initially in the centre of the city, expanding outward)âwe can grow the local economy and create jobs. After that we can look at partyingâbut not till we earn Wellingtoniansâ respect by doing a bloody good job.
A city that supports its clusters strategically will be able to balance the budgetâand so far, it seems Iâm the only candidate who is even willing to talk about this issue.
We can start improving those communities through the new jobs weâll be creating, and deal a blow to inner-city crime.
If we fall behind on the tech side of things, consider this: we will lose the Sevens and any other event because our visitors will be asking, âWhy canât I get on to Google Maps on my iPhone without paying for it?â Itâs very simple, and when a mayor and council miss out on the simplest things, then it is time for a change.
I would have thought a divided councilâa complaint of the incumbent, Kerry Prendergastâwould mean that we would not be spending massive amounts on things because there would be a lack of agreement. Spending ratepayersâ money, for some reason, seems to get rapid accord in this councilâwhich tells me that when we vote in our mayor and council later in the year, we should have a far greater change than even I would have expected when I began my campaign.
We have a divided council that needs firm direction on how to grow the economy, and a mayor who understands what âworld-class cityâ means.
World-class does not mean big. World-class means nimble, modern and transparent.
In 2010, we donât need the same old, tired voices. Or the same old Ă©lites. The direction Wellington needs is a fresh one that brings new promises.
Incidentally, we have added a Facebook widget for my campaign page on this blog. Itâs been placed at a few locations on my sites. Also, as of today, backjack2010.com redirects to jackyanformayor.orgâitâs important to have the consistency in the domain name and the campaign graphic (thanks to Demian Rosenblatt).
Tags: Aotearoa, budget, city, creativity, economics, economy, Fairfax Press, government, industry clusters, Jack Yan, mayoralty, media, New Zealand, politics, Scoop, technology, transparency, Wellington, Wellington City Council, Whanganui-a-Tara, world-class
Posted in New Zealand, Wellington, business, internet, leadership, media, politics, technology | No Comments »
More Buzz, a small buzz, and my real and virtual lives meet
22.02.2010
My friend Pete informs me of his Google Buzz experience, and itâs not positive, either.
He is no stranger to technology and is more expert than I am on these matters. He had turned off Buzz, and was surprised to find that it was still taking his information and publishing it to his followers.
His sister took a screen shot of what she saw on her screen, which is shown above. Notice at the top of the screen, it says that Pete is following herâeven though by this time he had turned Buzz off. In Peteâs words: âIâve now had to go into settings where there is a further option to disable it altogether and kill all your posts. Iâm hoping that stops it!â
I hope so, too!
If any of the old Voxers are still around reading this blog, I met up with Paikea (a nom-de-plume of one of my neighbours and friends on the old Vox blogging platform) on Sunday. It was a wonderful catch-up and it was as though we had been Real World 1·0 friends for years. Sometimes, blogs really do help you get into the mind of others so you know if you would hit it off or not.
I look forward to meeting her husband in the near future, too, and we have exchanged phone numbers and emails. I wonder if Linda-Joy and her husband might be next, as they are nearby in Melbourne.

Finally for tonight, how about the above? These are the followers on one Twitter account (I have an inkling who it is, but itâs not my place to say so). If you want me to feel honoured and very flattered, then following HM Queen Rania al-Abdullah of Jordan, Shakira Ripoll, Sir Richard Branson and Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger immediately after me will do it. I am also in good company with my dear friend Manas Fuloria over in Gurgaon.
Tags: Google, internet, Jack Yan, technology, Twitter, Vox
Posted in India, New Zealand, business, culture, humour, internet, technology | 5 Comments »
I don’t have Gmail. So how did I get a Buzz account again?
18.02.2010
Can someone please explain to me how I have a Google Buzz account?
Yes, I know, all those people complaining about Google Buzz found that their Gmail contacts where, all of a sudden, added to the service.
And Google, this week, apologized for messing up.
Well, Google, please explain my scenario, because I donât have a bloody Gmail account.
Yet, youâve seen fit to provide me with a Buzz accountâsomething I do not wantâand, like so many others, added 19 followers to it.

Above: Buzz has been the centre of complaints for Gmail users these past few weeks. Google now extends that to non-Gmail users.
This was today. This was after your supposed apology for messing up peopleâs privacy.
I guess youâve figured that after messing up Gmail usersâ lives, youâre now going after non-Gmail users.
Incidentally, can someone also please explain to me why I have 18 requests for Google Reader followers when I have done everything possible to remove every last piece of information out of there? Just where did these 18 suddenly come from?

Above: Despite deleting everything out of my Google Reader account, today I have 18 people wanting to be the followers of an empty account. Nice one, Google.
Of those eighteen, I know seven.
I am talking about Google Readerâthat service which still gave me recommendations for sites to follow based on my feeds and Web History, even though I had no feeds and had turned off Web History. Privacy breach much?
Then, in my Google Profile, why have you introduced new fields in there and checked them by default? I was very careful to remove information out of there, but now, supposedly, I want you to âDisplay the list of people Iâm following and people following meâ.

Above: A new field was added to my Google Profile, checked by defaultâto ensure less privacy. Less than a day after it apologized for breaching peopleâs privacy. Hypocrisy much?
Are your people so stupid that you would introduce a new field dealing with privacy and turn it on by default? The week after your Google Buzz débùcle? Who did you hire? People from Facebook?
Does your HR department hire bottom-of-the-class guys, or do you find morons and train them down?
Rather ironical, considering that this week, I have been de-Googling my life. Looks like Google doesnât like my removing myself from its services, so itâs forcibly put me on to new ones and created new options which it has checked by default, decreasing my privacy.
It wasnât enough that you had put me on to Reader and turned on Web History after I turned it off.
Consider my profile deleted, dickheads. You are not getting any more of my personal information from me.
Really, Google, WTF?

Above: I donât have Gmail. Look, Google, itâs in my ânew products to tryâ section.
PS.: Deleting my profile has made no difference to my Buzz account: it remains there, complete with followers.âJY
P.PS.: Scootley at the Gmail forums explains that anyone can get a Buzz account, even if they do not use Gmail. Hereâs what I donât get (correct me if I am wrong):
âą Buzz is part of Gmail.
âą If I have never signed up to Gmail and agreed to its terms and conditions, what governs my relationship with Google over Buzz?
I decided to find out.
Answer: none.
On visiting Google Buzzâs home page, and following the links at the bottom of that page to the terms and conditions and privacy policy, I encountered these two pages:

Above: Google has no terms and conditions for Buzz (URL accessed 2.27 p.m. GMT [and again at 10.26 p.m. GMT]).

Above: Google has no privacy policy for Buzz (URL accessed 2.27 p.m. GMT [and again at 10.26 p.m. GMT]).
Ironically, I re-created a new profile and unchecked the âDisplay the list of people Iâm following and people following meâ option, and now, Buzz has finally disappeared. (This did not work earlierâand Scootley confirms that that should have had no effect on Buzzâs presence in my Google Dashboard. Still, itâs gone, so Iâm happy.)âJY
P.P.PS.: One consequence of having no Google profile is that Google punishes you in the search results. In an ego-surf of my name with quotes, I dipped 10,000 results because of the missing profile. (I also dipped 10,000 after an earlier attempt a few days ago of having my profile turned off.) Like one page on Google really counts for 10,000 hitsâbut apparently, Google gets pissy at you for turning your profile off!
Well, Iâd rather have a drop of 10,000 references than have weird services appear in my Google profile!âJY
Tags: business, ethics, Google, internet, law, privacy, technology, USA
Posted in USA, business, internet, technology | 6 Comments »
A belated thank-you to independent software creators
18.02.2010When I had to reinstall everything late last year, I didnât thank the software developers for making it easy for me to get a new ID. I got personal replies from the programmers behind Barcode Maker 3 and SayNow, and found it relatively easy to sort out registration for FontLab and Gammadyne Mailer. The rest of the programs were straightforward with their licence numbers, but I have to give props to the independentsâpeople who still give a damn about their creations. Thank you.
Tags: computing, FontLab, software
Posted in Sweden, USA, internet, technology | No Comments »
More Google privacy breaches in Reader?
14.02.2010Tonight, I removed every single blog I followedâincluding my ownâfrom Blogger. My de-Googling continues. Iâve also taken myself off as an author on some Blogger blogs as of tonight, as an intermediate step of ending my association with Blogger altogether.
I had hoped that deleting my Blogger reading list would get me off the Google Reader service, which I never (knowingly) signed up for. As mentioned recently, Google decided that my following blogs on Blogger would mean (a) it would open a Google Reader account (it was in its help pages, which I did not readâI argue this should have been on a terms and conditions page); (b) allow others to begin following that account; (c) prevent any removal of my Google Reader account, even when I did not want one.
You would think that deleting everything associated with Google Reader would allow its removal, but no. In fact, I was rather disturbed to see the following: feed recommendations in Reader.

Among the recommendations is my friend Sharon Haverâs site, Focus on Style, and another from CondĂ© Nastâs Style.com.
Normally I would not have a problem with seeing either of these, if I was an avid Reader user, but it begs the question: if I have turned off all the sharing of my data in Google, to the point where the company claims to no longer knows my preferences, then how does it know my preferences? How does it, in this case, know that I have interests in the fashion industry? Or is everyone on the planet interested in fashion, according to Google, and these are its default recommendations?
After all, Google itself states that it compiles these preferences based on the following:
It takes into account the feeds youâre already subscribed to, as well as information from your Web History, including your location.
Well, Google, not only have I switched Web History off (twice: once on launch and once after you turned it back on without telling me), I have no feeds.
Which must mean, I assume, that turning stuff off in Google does not mean turning stuff off in Google. Google might say you have Web History turned off, but I am wondering if thatâs just more BS from this company.
It might have decent blokes like Rick Klau working there at Blogger, but the rest of the company seems dodgier by the day to me. Weâve already had tech support guys who know very little about tech or support (those six months probably were what kicked off my de-Googling), weâve had the whole Buzz dĂ©bĂącle (Harriet Jacobs, a.k.a. Fugitivus, mentioned in that post, has since shut her blog to unregistered users after, presumably, abuse was sent to her), and now, it seems that Google spies on you.
The 2010s will see the dĂ©but of some form of portal site, but it definitely wonât be Facebook, and, at this rate, it wonât be Google.
And thatâs a shame. I like some of the things that Google has offered me over the last 11 years, but its behaviour of late, and its ill-thought technologies, remind me of another American giant. Thatâs the one that people in the 1990s picked on a lot: Microsoft.
Tags: Blogger, deceit, ethics, fashion, Google, internet, privacy
Posted in USA, business, internet, technology | 3 Comments »
I do not stand for John Key’s defeatist talk
09.02.2010Iâve heard it all before. In the 1980s, the New Zealand Government promised that, with the introduction of Goods and Servicesâ Tax (GST), people would be better off, because it would mean more money in our pockets.
With the proposal to hike GST to 15 per cent under the current government, Prime Minister John Key is singing a similar tune: that somehow, this will be better for us, offset by a reduction in income tax.
Itâs the same tune that was sung 25 years ago by another technocratic government, clueless on actually how to grow the economy without stealing from the general public.
Economies are grown through innovation and creating circumstances that allow that to happen, which was what the National Party promised with its broadband strategy. Weâve since heard less about that and more about putting some cycle tracks through the country for touristsâall short-term projects from people who have never had to start a long-term business in their lives.
Unemployment is now up to 7·3 per cent. Before you say itâs not that bad compared with overseas, itâs still pretty terrible. Itâs why this has been the core of a lot of my mayoral campaign messages: we need to get unemployment down. How? By creating the environment through which innovation can be fostered.
In Wellington, that means building on the creative and technological clusters people have been creating. What this city should have in the next three years is a mayor and council that support thisâbecause it is in the national interest.
When Dr Alan Bollard, Governor of the Reserve Bank, said we should not bother trying to match Australiaâs standard of living by 2025 because we lacked the natural resources, I was shocked at what I would call a defeatist attitudeâone that the PM seems to share with trying to take from everyday New Zealanders.
I hope that Dr Bollard can inform me of the context, as I was out of the country when he made his statement on television.
But I will say that we already are among the most innovative people in the world, both out of our natural creativity and out of necessity.
We also know that economies are built on industry clustersâsomething that already exists in Wellington and needs just enough encouragement from a supportive mayor and council.
We also know that in the 21st century, trying to grow an economy based around primary products and natural resources is an outmoded idea. They are important, of course, and New Zealand will always need a vibrant primary sector, but the real growth is in intellectual capitalâsomething which people in national politics seem to lack.
What we donât have are enough people seeking public office who can see this. People who want to grow the economy. People who believe enough in the intelligence and innovation of New Zealanders.
Well, I believe in us, and I believe in our potential. I also donât believe in robbing everyday New Zealanders of their hard-earned cash.
While some ratesâ increases are already planned by this current administration, let us try to minimize future increases by creating real businesses for Wellington, and for this city.
Letâs also show the defeatists that they are yesterdayâs men. We know better, and we can do better.
Tags: 2010, Aotearoa, creative clusters, creativity, economic growth, economy, industry clusters, innovation, Jack Yan, John Key, mayoralty, New Zealand, technocracy, technology, unemployment, Wellington, Whanganui-a-Tara
Posted in New Zealand, Wellington, business, internet, leadership, politics, technology | 6 Comments »
Toyota’s troubles stem from forgetting its principles
06.02.2010
I was surprised to learn that Toyota still has not issued a worldwide recall of its troublesome Prius NHW30 model, even though one had gone out in New Zealand.
In laymanâs terms, the brakes allegedly donât work when you want them to. In more complex terms, the software has trouble distinguishing between different types of braking, and drivers may experience a delay in âpedal feelâ.
I was always a bit sceptical about the recalls over the unintended acceleration, given that the last time I heard those words, they were in relation to a falsified report from CBSâs 60 Minutes, a show known to me for making up stories (Killian memoranda, anyone?). Hearing them again, I thought it was just another excuse for the clumsy driving of a few individuals who couldnât figure out where the accelerator was (which was what happened with Audi in the US). But it seems this matter has been around for a long time, and recalls were being done even last year.
But the Prius matter, something that has not come under a global recall, appears more serious than carpets getting in the way, which is the problem behind the unintended acceleration complaints. AFP reports:
The Transport Ministry has received some 80 complaints in February about malfunctions in the brake system of the latest model of the flagship Prius, the Tokyo Shimbun reported without quoting sources.
Five of them were actual crashes in which the drivers claimed the brakes did not work properly, the daily said, adding that the ministry would urge the company to launch an investigation.
It was not possible to immediately confirm the report.
Already Toyota has been berated by top management for going too far from its core principles by its honorary chairman, Shoichiro Toyoda. The company had been trying to sell big cars in China during the financial crisis, and spent a good part of the 2000s developing large pick-up trucks for the US market. Bloomberg reported last June that a meeting was called:
Shoichiro scolded the president [Katsuaki Watanabe] for being so anxious to boost sales and profits that heâd let Toyota emulate now bankrupt General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC. Toyota had become addicted to big, expensive cars and trucks and had forgotten the customersâ need to save money, Shoichiro said, according to the personâs account.
In other words, Toyotaâs culture has been suffering, and we all know what happens when salesâ volume and profit are pursued at the expense of quality or engineering. (Ask Mercedes-Benz.)
Toyota may be an example where too many niches were created, simply to get consumers in the showroomsâand now thatâs coming to bite it on the rear end. Having too many niches has one immediate drawback: consumers no longer understand the structure of the range. Is the small car the iQ, Ist, Vitz, Porte, Belta or Passo? Do I move from that to a Corolla, Auris, Blade, Corolla Rumion, Probox, Raum, RAV4 or wotsis?
The mistakes are understandable in some ways. Toyota had to create more new models as attention spans shortened. While a car might be able to be presented as ânewâ for two years in the Japanese market 10 years ago, consumers expect something else within half a year. To fund this appetite, the company looked for ways to maximize profits in every marketâwith the US one fuelled by bigger and bigger vehicles. It had to take costs out of cars, especially with electronics (by combining as many functions on to one system as possible) and architectureâand it may be these areas where the Prius suffered.
But no company can really afford to pursue too many nichesâMazda overextended itself in the late 1980s and early 1990s, as did Nissan in the early 1990sâwhen times are tough. Toyota should have forecast a downturn, as many business experts did. The question that the company needs to ask itself is: what made it so blind in the 2000s?
Even ignoring the idea of unintended acceleration for now, Toyota ends the lunar year on a low. It will always have its diehard followersâthere are many models not affected by these issuesâbut the company must refocus its brand for the New Year toward its traditional principles. There is every sign the company knows that, with Akio Toyoda, the founderâs grandson, now at the helm, and doing spot checks down on the production floor. (Iâd rather Toyota have someone like that than a âcelebrity CEOâ who gives good press. The era of the celebrity boss is over for now.) It is simply a pity that the company did not get on to its mounting problemsâthere are claims that unintended acceleration reports began surfacing with Toyotaâs Lexus ES model as early as 2004âsooner.
Few buy a Toyota because the cars make oneâs heart beat faster. They are a default choice for many people who want the simplest conveyance from A to B. Akioâs job has been reminding his own team of that, and reinstituting the âToyota Wayâ and kaizen, terms that many of us who went to business school during a certain era recall.
Tags: brand, brand equity, car industry, cars, Japan, leadership, management, marketing, marketing strategy, media, New Zealand, niche strategy, perceived quality, recall, safety, technology, Toyota, USA
Posted in New Zealand, USA, branding, business, cars, culture, leadership, marketing, media, technology | 4 Comments »





































