Tumblr is dead, long live NewTumbl.
I came across NewTumbl (formally newTumbl) a few days ago, after finding my Tumblr feed just wasnāt what it used to be. Itās not that the dirty pictures are goneāI only ever followed one blog where the images might be considered sensualābut that the energy was. Those friends whose posts interested me werenāt posting much any more, and it wasnāt just them: my posting had diminished significantly. Platforms, I imagine, have a shelf life, and when announcements such as Verizonās last year, which became known, perhaps incorrectly, as Tumblrās āporn banā, it was bound to affect the platform. It was the language that opened Verizon up to ridicule: apparently, they had a problem with āfemale-presenting nipplesā, and some innocent content was flagged for removal.
What Verizon had really underestimated was that among the adult imagery were communities that were having free and safe discussions about sexuality, and sex workers themselves had a place where they, too, could post. It wasnāt an āadultā site per se, considering the overwhelming majority of the content was family-friendly. That perhaps kept the place relatively safe: you could have these private discussions while coming across general posts featuring interesting photography or good political viewpoints. Tumblr also hadnāt descended into the political divisiveness that plague platforms such as Twitter.
I liked Tumblr for many reasons. It became a fun place to post interesting graphics for me, and to put anything that I didnāt want to structure into long-form thoughts. It was image-based. Every now and then I would put up a quotation. The Font Police blog is still there, with over 20,000 followers.
I liked the fact that for years, someone would get back to you when you posted a query. This was true even after Yahoo acquired it.
But during the Blogcozy experiment, which sadly resulted in that platformās closure, I cut down my time on Tumblr, because I had found a more suitable place to put those brief thoughts and to share with friends. Had Tumblr been a greater draw, I wouldnāt have considered it. After Blogcozy closed, I didnāt really resume my Tumblring to the same extent. Social seemed to be dying, since it was being run by Big Tech firms that lied as their main position. Even if Tumblr was more honest (and it was), the age of social media seemed to be at an end.
I may have been wrong, because since posting on NewTumbl Iāve been impressed by the sense of energy there. Yes, it has attracted a great deal of the adult posters who left Tumblr. But if you donāt want to see X-rated stuff, you say so in the settings, and adjust to M (for mature), O (for office), or even F (for family). You won’t see anything coarser than what you chose (with the occasional exception when posters did not have a clue how the ratings’ system works). The interface is familiar-but-different-enough for Tumblr users and Verizon lawyers. Yet it goes beyond what Tumblr does, with the smart use of Interstate as the body typeface, and photos in multi-image posts actually appear in the order you load them.
Itās not perfect: I couldnāt link a video but I could upload; and I managed to stumble on a 404 page by following links, both of which Iāll report, since they make it so easy to do.
But hereās the really good thing: the transparency. One of the main developers, Dean, talks to users and provides feedback. Heāll even post when an error occurs during developmentāthatās something youāll never see Facebook do when its databases die.
He and I have already exchanged notes via DMs after I joined for two days, and I said I saw so many parallels between what he was doing and what I saw with Tesla when Martin Eberhard was running it (transparency over ego), or even in the days when Jerry and David were building YahooāIām old enough to have been submitting sites to them while they were still being run out of a garage. Thereās an exciting sense with Dean and the small NewTumbl crew that theyāre building something useful for the world, celebrating free speech and humanity. Am I being overly optimistic? I donāt think I am: I enjoy the UI, I like the openness and honesty, and these are just what the tech sector needs. I see a draw for spending my time here even though I have zero followers to my blog. The buzz feels similar to when I discovered some sites back in the 1990s: it seems new and exciting.
Itās also rather nice being the first person to populate some fandom hashtags, though I was second for Doctor Who, and for anyone ever searching for The Avengers, they will see, rightly, a photograph of Diana Rigg and Patrick Macnee.
Iāll see you there at jackyan.newtumbl.com. Lucire also has a NewTumbl at lucire.newtumbl.com.
Above: The one thing I posted to Tumblr that went viral, in 2011.
The following status update was posted on my Facebook wall to some of my friends earlier tonight, though of course the links have been added here.
I realize thereās some irony in posting this on Facebook.
Some of you will have noticed that I havenāt been updating as frequently. Thatās in line with global trends: personal sharing was down 25 per cent year on year between 2015 and 2016, and 29 per cent between 2016 and 2017. After 10 years on Facebook, sometimes I feel Iāve shared enough.
Even on my own blog, I havenāt done as much in-depth on branding, because my theories and beliefs havenāt markedly changed.
None of ours do too much. I may have changed a handful of minds through discussions Iāve had here, and on occasion youāve changed my mind. Iāve seen how some of you have terrible arguments, and how brilliant others are. But overall, has the past decade of exchanges really been worth that much? Some of you here are on the left of politics, and some of you on the right. I hope through dialogue you all wound up with a mutual understanding of one another. I have seen some of you come to a very healthy respect on this wall, and that was worth it. But I wonder if it is my job to be āhosting debatesā. Those debates simply serve to underline that all my friends are decent people, and Iāve made good choices over the last decade on who gets to read this wall in full. None of it has changed what I thought of you, unless in those very rare examples youāve shown yourself to be totally incapable of rational thought (and youāve probably left in a huff anyway). It shows Iām open-minded enough to have friends from all over the world of all political persuasions, faiths, beliefs, sexual orientations, gender identities, educational levels, and socioeconomic grouping, because none of that ultimately says whether you are a decent human being or not. At the end of the day, that is the only real measure.
If youāre reading this, then we know each other personally, and you know where this is heading. Youāll find me increasingly more at Mastodon, Hubzilla, Blogcozy, Instagram (I know, itās owned by Facebook) and my own blog. We donāt exactly need this forum to be messaging and debating. I will continue to frequent some groups and look after some pages, including my public page here on Facebook.
And of course Iāll continue writing, but not on a site that feeds malware to people (Facebook has bragged about this officially), tracks your preferences after opting out, tolerates sexual harassment,keeps kiddie porn and pornography online even after reports are filed, and has an absolutely appalling record of removing bots and spammers. These are all a matter of record.
If I mess up, I trust you, as my friends, to contact me through other means and to tell me Iāve been a dick. If you agree or disagree with viewpoints, there are blog comments or other means of voicing that, or, as some of you have done on Facebook (because you, too, have probably realized the futility of engaging in comments), you can send me a message. Heck, you could even pick up the phone. And if you want to congratulate me, well, that should be easy.
Of course itās not a complete farewell. As long as this account stays openāand Facebook wonāt let you manage pages without oneāthen the odd update will still wind up on this wall. I may feel strongly enough about something that it demands sharing. But, 10 years later, there are better places to be having conversations, especially as social media democratizes and users demand that they have control over their identities and how to use them.
Above: Just another regular day on Facebook: find more bots, report them, Facebook does nothing.
A friend asked today, for an article he is penning, whether we were close to quitting social media on his Facebook (I realize the irony). Here was my reply (links and styling added). What are your thoughts? Are the big social media sites coming to an end? We’ve definitely passed peak Facebook. Peak Twitter has been and gone, too, given that the platform now entertains 280 characters and has effectively said people who abuse its terms and conditions can stay if they’re newsworthy.
[Name omitted], hereās my take on it.
Iām cutting back on Facebook for a number of reasons. The first is that this site doesnāt work. There are too many bugs, too many times when I cannot like, post or comment. Facebook has bragged about forcing people to download malware scanners (I can provide links) that have nothing to do with malware being on the userās systems. I wrote this up on [m]y blog and tens of thousands have read it. While thatās not millions of users, thatās still a lot. And I think the reality is that millions are affected.
Besides, Facebook has lied about its user numbers. As a business I canāt really support it. I have businesses I am involved in here where I donāt have a 100 per cent ownership, so those still spend. But when Facebook claims more people in certain demographicsāmillions more than in government censusesāthen that is a worry.
That leads me on to another point: bots. This place is full of them. I used to see more bots in my group queues than humans. I report them. In probably 40 per cent of cases, Facebook does nothing about them. So even for my businesses I wonder if there is any point posting here if I am getting a bot audience. My group numbers are shrinking in some cases, so Iām not alone in wanting out of this platform.
And what more is there to share? I used to share photos but, frankly, I no longer can be arsed. I have Instagram for that, and thatās sufficient for me. My life is interesting but those who need to know already know. I will have seen them IRL. Just like the old days. There arenāt many things I want to update people on because my views on them havenāt changed hugely. Facebook is my Digg anyway, and has been for years. And if they carry out their promise to move news articles off the main feed (as they have done in some countries), then thereās no point sharing those either. You know statistically personal sharing is down 25 and 29 per cent year on year for the last few years, so we are not alone.
Twitter I have read your concerns about, but to me itās the better platform for having a chat, but there I am incensed that there is a double standard. Politicians can stay and abuse people because Twitter says theyāre newsworthy. Everything is newsworthy to someone. They should not be the arbiters of that. While I havenāt seen the level of outrage (must be the people I follow) that you wrote about a few weeks agoāif anything I find it better now than in 2013ā14āit has become less interesting as a place to be. All platforms, as I might have said earlier, deterioriate: remember how good email was before spammers? Or YouTube without brain-dead comments? Or, for that matter, any online newspaper? They attract a class of non-thinkers after a while, immovable when it comes to rational dialogue. We cannot level the blame solely at social media, it is society. You quit this, then there is no reason not to quit Stuff, for example: poor writing, no editing, and the comments, oh the comments! Or life in general: you and I wouldnāt walk into a redneck bar and talk diversity to the locals. Therefore we wouldnāt frequent certain places on the ānet. It isnāt just social media we would avoid overall: there are millions of sites that we just wouldnāt venture to, and we have to ask where we would draw the line. And maybe, then, these platforms do have a placeābut we watch our privacy settings, and we donāt look at the main feed.
I have been advancing the idea of going back to long-form blogging anyway. You control who comments. You determine who you converse with. And if they made it through your post, then that took more intelligence than getting through a Stuff article, so at least youāre cutting out a certain type of person. Maybe the past is the future. Weāre not hiding with those blogs, but we are setting the bar where we want itāand that might just deal with the problems youāve observed in social media.
There are sites like Blogcozy, a blogging platform inspired by the old Vox (before Six Apart shut it down). Iām on there a lot, I have a nice following of a few dozen trusted people, and it blends the best of both worlds: long-form writing with social networking, posts shared only with those I choose in my settings.
In the 14 years Iāve bloggedāa lot less than youāIāve had decent comments, so maybe it is time to fire up our own platforms more and get eyeballs on our own work.
My friend Richard MacManus commemorated the 14th anniversary of ReadWrite, an online publication he founded as a blog (then called ReadWriteWeb) in 2003, by examining blogging and how the open web has suffered with the rise of Facebook and others.
It’s worth a read, and earlier tonight I fed in the following comment.
I remember those days well, although my progress was probably the opposite of yours, and, in my circles, blogging began very selfishly. Lucire began as a publication, laid out the old-school way with HTML, and one of the first sites in the fashion sector to add a blog was a very crappy one where it was about an ill-informed and somewhat amoral editorās point of view. For years I refused to blog, preferring to continue publishing an online magazine.
Come 2002, and we at the Medinge Group [as it then was; we’ve since dropped the definite article] were planning a book called Beyond Branding. One of the thoughts was that we needed one of these newfangled blogs to promote the book, and to add to it for our readers. I was one (the only?) dissenter at the June 2003 meeting, saying that, as far as my contacts were concerned, blogging was for tossers. (Obviously, I didnāt know you back in those days, and didnāt frequent ReadWriteWeb.) [Hugh MacLeod might agree with me though.] By August 2003 it had been set up, and I designed the template for it to match the rest of the bookās artwork. How wrong I was in June. The blog began (and finished, in 2006) with posts in the altruistic, passionate spirit of RWW, and before long (I think it was September 2003), I joined my friends and colleagues.
An excerpt from the Beyond Branding Blog index page.
In 2006, I went off and did my own blog, and even though there were hundreds of thousands (millions?) of blogs by now, decent bloggers were still few. I say this because within the first few weeks, a major German newspaper was already quoting my blog, and I got my first al-Jazeera English gig as a result of my blogging a few years later. It was the province of the passionate writer, and the good ones still got noticed.
I still have faith in the blogosphere simply because social media, as you say, have different motives and shared links are fleeting. Want to find a decent post you made on Facebook five years ago? Good luck. Social media might be good for instant gratificationāyour friends will like stuff you writeābut so what? Where are the analysis and the passion? I agree with everything you say here, Richard: the current media arenāt the same, and thereās still a place for long-form blogging. The fact I am commenting (after two others) shows there is. Itās a better place to exchange thoughts, and at least here weāre spared Facebook pushing malware on to people (no, not phishing: Facebook itself).
Eleven years on, and Iām still blogging at my own space. I even manage a collective blogging site for a friend, called Blogcozy. My Tumblr began in 2007 and itās still going. We should be going away from the big sites, because thereās one more danger that I should point out.
Google, Facebook et al are the establishment now, and, as such, they prop up others in the establishment. Google News was once meritorious, now it favours big media names ahead of independents. This dangerously drowns out those independent voices, and credible writers and viewpoints can get lost. The only exception I can think of is The Intercept, which gets noticed on a wide scale.
Take this argument further and is there still the same encouragement for innovators to give it a go, as we did in the early 2000s, when we realize that our work might never be seen, or if it is to be seen, we need deep pockets to get it seen?
Maybe we need to encourage people to go away from these walled gardens, to find ways to promote the passionate voices again. Maybe a future search engineāor a current one that sees the lightācould have a search specifically for these so weāre not reliant on the same old voices and the same old sites. And Iām sure there are other ways besides. For I see little point in posting on places that lack ācharismaā, as you put it. They just donāt excite me as much as discovering a blog I really like, and sticking with it. With Facebookās personal sharing down 25 and 29 per cent in 2015 and 2016 respectively, there is a shift away from uninspiring, privacy-destroying places. Hopefully we can catch them at more compelling and interesting blogs and make them feel at home.
