<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jack Yan: the Persuader Blog &#187; survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jackyan.com/blog/tag/survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jackyan.com/blog</link>
	<description>Branding, leadership, typography, marketing and the media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Docs doesn&#8217;t want bad news</title>
		<link>http://jackyan.com/blog/2010/03/google-docs-doesnt-want-bad-news/</link>
		<comments>http://jackyan.com/blog/2010/03/google-docs-doesnt-want-bad-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Yan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackyan.com/blog/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


This is a bit odd. I was asked to &#64257;ll out a survey regarding Google Docs, which I promptly did. I didn’t give it very high marks, and after clicking submit, the response was ‘You have indicated that you do not use Google Docs.’
&#160; &#160;I beg your pardon?
&#160; &#160;I indicated that I had used Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fjackyan.com%252Fblog%252F2010%252F03%252Fgoogle-docs-doesnt-want-bad-news%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F9bZYvP%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Google%20Docs%20doesn%26%238217%3Bt%20want%20bad%20news%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><img src="/blog/2010/0318b1.png" alt="Google survey" /></p>
<p>This is a bit odd. I was asked to &#64257;ll out a survey regarding Google Docs, which I promptly did. I didn’t give it very high marks, and after clicking submit, the response was ‘You have indicated that you do not use Google Docs.’<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp;I beg your pardon?<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp;I indicated that I <em>had</em> used Google Docs, because Google de&#64257;nes the service as follows: ‘Consider Google Docs products including Google Documents, Spreadsheets, Presentations, Forms, and its homepage.’ I have indeed opened Google documents and I have been to the home page. I have outputted documents from there—I know that because I did that tonight.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp;However, it seems Google does not want to hear bad news from its survey respondents, so those of us who give it a low score are classed as people who have not used the service. Otherwise, the logic must go, why on earth would you rank it so poorly? <em>Everyone</em> here, from Eric Schmidt downwards, knows that Google Docs deserves a high rating! You are obviously inexperienced!<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp;This prompted me to do a bit of sur&#64257;ng about the survey. I was interested, in my “I have it in for Google” (thanks, Nigel!) mode, that deleting a Google Docs &#64257;le does not mean that associated images are also wiped. Those who use the service might wish to take heed.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp;In 2007, <a href="http://www.line-of-reasoning.com/issues/privacy-issue-google-docs-seems-to-not-delete-but-only-hide-documents-when-the-trash-is-emptied/">Ralf Scharnetzki created a <em>private, unpublished</em> Google Docs document</a>, with an image. He deleted the document. However, three years on, you can still access the image <a href="http://docs.google.com/File?id=dchrr3kn_5cdc9q3dc">here (at a docs.google.com link)</a>.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp;I realize that in 99 per cent of cases, the image will be secure. No one other than the author—and not every author, either—will know the location of an image. But on the internet, stranger things have happened. Obviously those with con&#64257;dential data would not use Google Docs to assemble their work—but we are only human: you never know when you might let your guard down.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp;Just be careful out there. ‘Deleted’ does not mean, well, deleted.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackyan.com/blog/2010/03/google-docs-doesnt-want-bad-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
