Jack Yan
Global  |  Leadership  |  Experience  |  Media  |  Videos
Blog  |  Gallery  |  Contact
 
  Follow me on Mastodon Follow me on Twitter Check out my Instagram account Follow me on Drivetribe Follow me on Linkedin Follow me on Weibo Subscribe to my blog’s RSS feed  

 

Share this page




Quick links


Surf to the online edition of Lucire




Add feed


 

The Persuader

My personal blog, started in 2006. No paid posts.



« | »

22.09.2014

Brand Kim Dotcom: what has changed?

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Brand Kim Dotcom: what has changed?”.


Filed under: branding, business, culture, internet, New Zealand, politics—Jack Yan @ 12.22

12 Responses to ‘Brand Kim Dotcom: what has changed?’

  1. […] See also:  Brand Kim Dotcom: what has changed? […]

  2. Brenda Agnew says:

    Great article, I agree 100%. It was very disappointing to see that prejudice has won the day. I am grateful that he brought Assange, Snowden and Greenwald here. It was a gift. I’m embarrassed at the way NZ and the media have treated this guy.

  3. Jack Yan says:

    Thank you, Brenda. As I re-read it, I was reminded: unlike Bob Jones, Kim Dotcom didn’t physically beat up journalists. Yet Bob still gets better treatment from the media.

  4. Karen Te Papa says:

    I wholeheartedly agree with you. Tall poppy syndrome? or maybe some people are just too ignorant for their own good. He is a resident, but he is also a person, and for people to villify him in this way is disgusting. Ignorance and prejudice, is that all this country has become????

  5. Jack Yan says:

    Well said, Karen. There has been far too much divisiveness in this election season—the local body elections last year were the same. It’s symptomatic of much bigger problems going on behind the scenes, making politics less pleasant—and, consequently, driving ordinary New Zealanders away from the process. It shouldn’t be like this.

  6. Greg 0s says:

    Dotcom did not beat up any media, but the media certainly beat up on him.
    What I noticed over the last few months has been the constant denigration of anything, especially the really good stuff, that has come from anyone left of National.
    The way the media painted Dotcom, Cunliffe and Harawira one would have thought these were filthy thieving lepers and that Jesus Key would continue saving the country as per usual.
    Is it any wonder we had such poor turnout at the booths.

  7. David B says:

    This country is full on red necks and idiots. Just a pack of sheep really. It’s worse than living in Australia, at least over there they have real kangaroo’s in their courts

  8. […] rather than examine the messages.’    New Zealanders begin vilifying Kim Dotcom: I respond.    I blog about Occupy Central in Hong Kong—which led to a television appearance on […]

  9. […] The passing of Richard ‘Jaws’ Kiel.    New Zealanders begin vilifying Kim Dotcom: I respond.    Hong Kong’s Occupy Central protests […]

  10. […] materials as Google and Dropbox has been indicted by the US Government—that’s right, I am talking about Kim Dotcom. It’s a reminder that we haven’t done enough for our tech sector, the one which […]

  11. […]    I see an appalling double standard when it comes to how this bloke is dealt with, e.g. he is dissed for spending money funding a political party but Colin Craig gets a pass for doing the …. He is dissed for showing us how our government monitors us by bringing in Glenn Greenwald yet we […]

  12. […] (and not pay tax here either). Because we have a tendency to kiss their arses sometimes. Just ask Kim Dotcom. Things like their legal precedents are still persuasive here, and with how different their […]

Leave a reply