Bing has tanked
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Bing has tanked”.
![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
||
Share this page Quick links
|
My personal blog, started in 2006. No paid or guest posts, no link sales. 24.07.2022 Bing has tankedYou are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Bing has tanked”. 4 Responses to ‘Bing has tanked’ |
About me A global mindset —Résumé Leadership Experience —Books and articles —Speeches Media —Press releases (off-site) The Persuader blog Contact |
Connected businesses and organizations Autocade Business Mentors New Zealand Insight Creative Jack Yan & Associates JY&A Consulting Lucire Medinge Group Sans and Serif Trustees Ltd. St Mark’s Church School Scots College |
Social Mastodon Facebook page | Copyright ©2002–22 by Jack Yan & Associates. All rights reserved. Photography copyright their respective authors and either used with permission or under fair use. JY&A terms and conditions and privacy policy apply to viewing this site.
Powered by
Wordpress.
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) |
Hi Jack,
Thanks for sharing this on Twitter. Something is wrong and they know about it. It seems to me that they are trying to avoid some kind of lawsuit by staying mum.
And why other SEOs are not talking about this is weird! I haven’t noticed any of the the big SEO bloggers talking about this.
Thank you for stopping by. It was when I was searching for news about this that I came across your Tweets. I think you are right: they are staying mum to avoid any legal claims. I find it curious Reddit would block me from telling people about this, too.
It makes me wonder if some of the big SEO bloggers even know what they’re talking about. This is pretty big news.
I will say that 8-9 out 10 of the SEO gals and guys are full of shit. They don’t know anything and just rewrites what Google already said on their search central blogs.
Super odd that all these guys and gals who are “gurus” haven’t written blogs or twitted about this.
It might even be higher than 8 to 9 out of 10—closer to 99 out of 100!