This is a bit odd. I was asked to fill out a survey regarding Google Docs, which I promptly did. I didnât give it very high marks, and after clicking submit, the response was âYou have indicated that you do not use Google Docs.â
I beg your pardon?
I indicated that I had used Google Docs, because Google defines the service as follows: âConsider Google Docs products including Google Documents, Spreadsheets, Presentations, Forms, and its homepage.â I have indeed opened Google documents and I have been to the home page. I have outputted documents from thereâI know that because I did that tonight.
However, it seems Google does not want to hear bad news from its survey respondents, so those of us who give it a low score are classed as people who have not used the service. Otherwise, the logic must go, why on earth would you rank it so poorly? Everyone here, from Eric Schmidt downwards, knows that Google Docs deserves a high rating! You are obviously inexperienced!
This prompted me to do a bit of surfing about the survey. I was interested, in my âI have it in for Googleâ (thanks, Nigel!) mode, that deleting a Google Docs file does not mean that associated images are also wiped. Those who use the service might wish to take heed.
In 2007, Ralf Scharnetzki created a private, unpublished Google Docs document, with an image. He deleted the document. However, three years on, you can still access the image here (at a docs.google.com link).
I realize that in 99 per cent of cases, the image will be secure. No one other than the authorâand not every author, eitherâwill know the location of an image. But on the internet, stranger things have happened. Obviously those with confidential data would not use Google Docs to assemble their workâbut we are only human: you never know when you might let your guard down.
Just be careful out there. âDeletedâ does not mean, well, deleted.
Posts tagged ‘cloud computing’
Google Docs doesn’t want bad news
18.03.2010Tags: cloud computing, Google, internet, privacy, survey
Posted in business, internet | 2 Comments »