JackYan.com
Jack and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Monaco street signs
Jack Yan: the Persuader blog
  Click here to go to home pageWhat I stand forMy stuffWhat others have recently saidMeet some of the coolest folks I knowDrop me a line Visit my workplace
> My stuff > The Persuader Blog


28.2.06

Déjà vu: it’s the 1970s again 

Lucire’s features’ editor Phillip Johnson tells me that his review for the April issue of the will have a lot of and . It’s a concern, I told him, because I have just got to the point where 1980s fashion is intolerable. Until last year I could still bear the thought of as Sammy Jo Carrington. But now, ’s clothes are beginning to look passé, at least that first season’s stuff. (, you are timeless.)
   The 1970s have been trying to bite us on the hind end for a while, in terms of fashion and . I am not a fan of —a ’s duty, I believe, is to keep advancing, rather than revisiting. Hence I quite happily speak out against it (things that suck: the Lamborghini Miura concept, the Dodge Challenger concept, the Ford GT) because while revisits can get in new audiences, they pander to old ones. In , the greatest risk is to take no risks—and is a no-risk proposition that will never get the “wow” factor that the first or the first Chrysler minivan did.
   , too, has gone back to the past—and while we are more limited here than with , I would rather we kept progressing. Maybe we all will wind up wearing those silver outfits and live on the moon. But till episodes of UFO become reality, I have to wonder what all this re-cycling (the hyphen is intentional) means.
   These retro only work if we are in a rear-view-mirror mood. We enter these moods typically when: (a) we have just forgotten how bad things were 10 years ago; (b) —a “reliable” source—suggest things were, indeed, better 10 years ago; (c) those same indicators forecast a rocky road ahead.
   We can probably draw parallels with the 1970s: rising , America in a , concerns over to cheaper production locales. But are we more as a planet in 2006? I am too young to remember 1972, and I haven’t seen to refresh my memory of the bad fashions, but assuming we aren’t a , then we have to look at our current situation as a chance—God-given or otherwise—to not repeat the mistakes of the past. If we can admit to mistakes—that it was of that led to injustices, and the absence of . Once we admit that (and what harm is there for those of us in the work-place today, other than upsetting some university lecturers who gave us facts we never criticized?), we can begin to do things right.

Del.icio.us tags: trends | cyclical | retro | design | fashion | economics | global economy | CSR | social responsibility
Post a Comment  Links to this post

If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them … 

I believe it’s official now—had blimmin’ better be since there are only a few days to go: yours truly begins a weekly spot on TV One’s Good Morning called ‘You’ve Got Male’. It’s a panel show where men talk about everyday issues, based on a topic selected by the producers. I start Friday, going out live on March 3, 9.30 a.m. I intend to turn it into something intelligent and maybe we can a little there, too—yes, through the . I might be the only consultant and out there with a regular network TV spot, but if I’m not, please write in and give me some tips!
   I think we can shed some light on understanding between people, even in an entertainment format. And I would like—and I hope I have room—to inject a bit of wit into it. There has been too much talk about how is these days, so why not revisit the wit of Frasier of Frasier, or Fraser Dick of ‘Dick of the Week’, or Dick Cheney of Quails of the Unexpected?
   On the 10th, I’ll be on Breakfast, same network, at 8.20 a.m., also live. And no, this does not mean I will let up with criticism of TV One news. I was told about this gig long before I was dissing its treatment of the affair.
   Brendon Pongia hosts the overall Good Morning show, while Newstalk ZB’s Barry Soper, SPARC’s Paul Sinclair and I try to make sense of what we have to deal with. Barry is older than the rest of us, which I think bodes well. Every successful that I have rated as a lad has followed a formula of an old guy, some young guys, and a car, or a variation thereof:

Knight Rider: a car, a stud, and an old man
Hardcastle & McCormick: a car, a stud, and an old man
The Sweeney: a car, a stud, and an old man
The Streets of San Francisco: a car, an old man, and a stud
The Equalizer: a car, an old man, and an even older man
Street Hawk: a bike, a stud, and a bald man
Solo One: a bike, a middle-aged man, and an old man
B. J. and the Bear: a truck, a stud, and a chimp
The Dukes of Hazzard: a car, two studs, and an old man
Starsky & Hutch: a car, two studs, and an old man
Miami Vice: a car, two studs, and a not-so-old man
Minder: two cars, a stud, and an old man
The Professionals: two cars, two studs, and an old man
The Persuaders: two cars, two middle-aged men, and an old man
CHiPs: two bikes, two studs, and an old man
Special Squad: three cars, one stud, and two old men

   I do not know if Mr Sinclair qualifies as a “stud”, but I was told early on that they needed to find a ‘young Dad’ for his role. Maybe he does. Looks like I have the part of the swinging bachelor. The car is not announced. Ergo: ‘You’ve Got Male’: no cars, three studs (or men with varying appearances) and an old man (sorry, Barry). If we can borrow a TVNZ van we can be an under-resourced, nouveau ‘A’ Team. Either that or Straight Eye for the Queer Guy.
   I’ll try to blog while travelling next week about the sights and sounds of a few different cities—and an Aston Martin I am being loaned. I am practising my Scots accent now. Better pretending to be a fictional Aston owner () than a factual one (HRH the Prince of Wales). What I will not do is order a bloody vodka martini and damage the drink by saying, ‘Shaken, not shtirred.’ That Bond is a classless cad.
   A more serious post later in the week. Promise. I am genuinely excited as I have always loved , and haven’t done a live spot since last May, so I’ll hope you’ll share a bit of that with me today.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

For whom everything sucks 

Normally I’d stay away from , but Cat Morley’s Designers Who Blog looks at Things that Suck, an entertaining look from someone who sees the glass as half-empty. Everything sucks, including American life (ambulance-chasing lawyers), business (spec work in the design profession), and people (Barry Williams, a.k.a. Greg Brady). Cranky Blogger, based in Boston, also writes about why he defected from QuarkXpress to Adobe InDesign.
   I can’t live with having to find something that sucked each day—it’s the opposite of positive that spiritualists tell us is what we should do. But Cranky Blogger has a point with many of his posts. Every now and then, if you’re feeling down, it may pay to see things through someone else’s eyes—even those of a pessimist—and see if everything in your life sucked. Like all dialogue in the blogosphere, it’s another perspective to learn from.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

26.2.06

Now we can talk 

I always knew Babelfish was around—and probably was one of the earliest people to begin using it, when the were a bit rougher—but in the era of , it’s come into its own.
   I might not surf to a or if I knew I couldn’t read it, but I might surf to a single blog post. When Stefan Engeseth pointed me to an Italian review of his upcoming book, One, it was Babelfish to the rescue, since my knowledge of the language is limited to asking directions and ordering food. I replied to the blog post in English. I assume that if the blogger was not an Anglophone, he’d Babelfish my words.
   The same thing happened with a Russian post earlier in the year. The gap may be narrowing, because we like to talk with one another.
   Even Turin is now commonly called , thanks to the Olympics. The Italian Job couldn’t manage that. We didn’t have Rome become Roma, or Tokyo take on its Japanese , with previous Olympiads—only certain cities in China (Beijing) and India (Mumbai, Chennai) have managed changes in my lifetime. Something is happening out there , and it’s an area where I can say technology has improved lives and understanding.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Malaysian heat and Qatari Frost 

Vincenzo, living in , reminds us that it’s not just that has a problem with . Ten days ago, he blogged: ‘[With] the resignation of two senior editors due to Squatgate, the suspension of an east Malaysia tribune, and recently the suspension of a night edition daily, I’m wondering whether the same stuff will be applied to us lesser mortals who on the ’.
   While the Nostalgia blog says it is ‘quasi-fictional’, it is disturbing that there remains some in the press, which appears to be what Vincenzo is hinting at. Perhaps those in that country would care to let me know more.
   Partly by contrast, an interview with National Radio’s Kim Hill last week in discussed the press freedoms at , where HRH the Emir of tends to be hands-off with the channel. The impression was the channel tended to be reasonably objective—and it was the first to interview Israelis on issues in the region, and , on which I have appeared, was regarded as an imitator who caught on to a good thing. Al-Jazeera International’s Sir (interviewed here in The Observer) estimates that several days’ worth of oil revenues in Qatar could keep Al-Jazeera going for a year.
   By western standards, HRH Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani’s powers may seem great, yet Qatar seems to operate efficiently, with a low .
   As a , I like the sound of Qatar, though I have never visited there. It appears (although my sources are the official ones) that there is a ruler who treats his subjects fairly; in return, the functions well. (A similar idea can apply in a .) The minute the state interferes, people feel mistrust—leading to areas of rebellion.
   Al-Jazeera may be the first from the when its service commences in May—which suggests to me that and numerous other cities in the region will be this century’s bright stars, all through exhibiting a sense of .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

CSR in the SAR 

Maxx Forum at Hong Kong CSR blogs about the records of corporations in the southern Chinese city and, incidentally, my home town. Maxx compiles news on some of the largest companies and their failures and successes, and even reveals how may have breached some standards on . The site is here.
   It’s also good to see that in some parts of , there are folks who are willing to express their views freely—even though and Macau enjoy a slightly different governmental system to the rest of the mainland.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Slowly, gently 

Business Week has an interview with Mena Trott, one half of the design team behind Moveable Type, who believes that won’t supplant mainstream news sites, foresees blog software getting easier to use, and that filtered readership is the next issue in blog design. Sensible, straight answers—neither the doom and gloom of The Wall Street Journal, nor the grand vision of blogs taking over the world.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

25.2.06

Remembering Corgi’s glory days 

A nostalgic post: Toys celebrates its 50th anniversary in July. A 50th anniversary mini-site is up at www.corgi50.com.
   Now part of —and a brand that it hasn’t ruined, unlike Matchbox—Corgi’s anniversary site reveals that the glory days are over. Corgi’s top 40 models, by its own reckoning, is heavily biased toward the 1950s and 1960s; the other decades are relatively sparse.
   This was a company that once innovated like crazy: with suspension, clear plastic windows, opening doors, and it still produces its most famous model, the DB5 with ejector seat.
   Financial difficulties which saw to the end of Lesney (), and itself (in 1983) meant that it changed direction toward the end of the 1980s. Corgi would appeal to the adult collector market, and that suited Mattel, which acquired it in the late 1980s, quite well.
   The company still designs excellent model cars, with production now in China, but other than London cabs, Routemaster buses and models, it’s been a long time since we saw additions to the regular line.
   It’s all very well focusing on the adult , but Corgi is at risk of losing new customers: today’s kids who will grow up to be adult collectors. Relying on us “grown-ups” means a steadily dropping customer base. Younger collectors today won’t have had the connected to the Corgi name.
   Corgi’s boss realizes this and says that 2006 will be the year where some toys will be reintroduced. The official site, however, shows some Postman Pat toys; while the brand has a new Vauxhall Astra and a Rover 75 (which I can find in New Zealand for nearly $50). There is a Mini from the Italian Job remake, but even discounted, at £7·99, it’s not exactly the pocket-money fare that will get loads of kids on board. Rover 75s are going for £5·99—bit like the real thing, they are being heavily discounted; a regular Mini goes for £4·99. Still pricey, and hardly “toys”.
   The only sign of new toys is in a Corgi Collection—of tanks, airplanes and helicopters. Hardly what Corgi was known for, nor does it connect with the adult collectibles.
   I know that Mattel has its line, which kids love; it also owns a steadily improving Matchbox. However, both brands are strictly —Matchbox has models that kids outside North America have little connection with. Corgi, once the great , still needs to get those , and it’s a cinch that kids won’t graduate from either Hot Wheels or Matchbox to it, if the are so different.
   There remains a huge market for the 1:64 scale models, served best these days by the likes of European brands such as and —who, with their present approaches, will likely retain . I realize they are less profitable, but with Mattel’s money, it could ensure future custom.

Del.icio.us tags: model cars | toy cars | Corgi | Mattel | brands | anniversary
Post a Comment  Links to this post

A pledge to change the business world 

This link was forwarded to me by writer Simon Young. I tried to get a pledge going a few years ago, without much success. This one looks better on the first page. Shel Horowitz proposes:

I believe that if I can get 25,000 business leaders—25,000 people to make a commitment to spread the ideas in Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First, that we can change the culture of business. Following the ideas expressed in the book The Tipping Point, and the story of the 100th Monkey, I feel, deep in my heart, that once a critical mass embraces the idea that high ethical standards are not only possible, but actually more profitable, society will change.

   I have signed up, as there are things I can do to help, though after I clicked on the ‘Submit’ button, I got a page trying to sell Mr Horowitz’s books. I’d rather not have seen that. I have my own ways of getting the word out that I feel comfortable with—and this is one of them. It’s also why I don’t turn this blog into a big spiel about my books or products (other than my involvement in “a day in the life of”).
   Criticism aside, let’s see if it has any effect. I hope it has the desired effect—it might even begin to inspire systemic changes in business.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Gore: ‘we face … a planetary emergency’ 

To be “fair and balanced”, I need to start blogging about some Republicans. For here’s another Democrat: former Veep , who spoke at TED, linked from Loïc Le Meur’s blog. His Podcast highlights some of the problems we face—and that we can .
   An earlier version, delivered in 2004, is at AlGore.org. I wouldn’t criticize the Hon Mr Gore for doing bits by way of a rerun: the issue remains more pressing now than in 2004; and it shows how little progress we’ve made in two years. And there’s more than enough new material in the speech that should make all of us very worried about how the world’s has become less stable in the last two years, and why lakes, glaciers and parts of the ice cap have disappeared.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Adolf Hitler started Volkswagen, after all 

I’m surprised at the grounds used in a referred by AdPulp today (citing Consumerist). One created a web site documenting the bad service he received at Golden Gate . The dealership and its owner, Mathew Zaheri, sued him for $1·5 million, using !
   After , the parties agreed to what content could remain on Mr Ghali’s .
   There are very obvious comments that could be made here. Why would a company try to deny a ’s rights? And the grounds used by Mr Zaheri were ridiculous, though credit to his law firm—they could have made it worse by making it a case on .
   The right way to have gone about this was to admit to some wrongdoing and allow Mr Ghali to document a . Consumer voices cannot be silenced. I hope that the had strongly advised Golden Gate and Mr Zaheri that his lawsuit was, at best, frivolous, rather than extend its palms outward for some fees.
   The consequence of this? Golden Gate VW’s will reduce rapidly as this story is propagated. Mr Zaheri will be thought of as intolerant. And, Volkswagen’s own will be harmed because it could not act to help Mr Ghali.
   Meanwhile, less nations will be laughing at the plaintiffs, because this sort of thing reinforces a about the .

Del.icio.us tags: brand | brand equity | Volkswagen | VW | consumer movement | customer service | lawsuit | whistle-blowing | frivolous lawsuits | law | First Amendment | trademark law | freedom of speech
Post a Comment  Links to this post

24.2.06

Jammin’ for peace 

Mike Swenson at Citizen Brand reminds us of PeaceJam, a group with winners on its board, and summarizes:

Since it was launched in 1996, more than 200,000 have been through the program. There have been 105 around the globe in the span of time. Each student has had an average of 45 hours of contact with their teacher, , community leader or PeaceJam staff member to help them identify and implement the 240,000 community service projects that have been completed in ten years. New programs are about to launch for the college and the elementary school levels as well.

   Members of the board (the board includes and the ) will be in , Col. in September to continue their “call to action” to help the planet. It’s initiatives like this that make being an adult less guilty: promoting a good cause, while still retaining ownership of the responsibility of making the better. And to help young people get on the right track, rather than letting them think that the “way of the dollar” is normal for the .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Trailer parked 

Stefan Engeseth has made available a “trailer” for his new book, One: a Consumer Revolution in Business, at his blog. His first chapter (layout tweaked by yours truly) is still available, but the “trailer” shows some of his favourite pages and illustrations. The last page of the trailer file is particularly meaningful.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Xenophobes ’r’ us 

During the 2004 US presidential campaign, the overall message we foreigners got was this: is a nationalistic , a dumbass who doesn’t know his foreign capitals, and, if re-elected, will totally end any with other nations. Bush, they told us, was a down-home renegade that hated everybody except the .
   They also told us: , on the other hand, has the support of leaders. He is more moderate, willing to cooperate and listen to other nations’ viewpoints, and at the , better represents the idea of America as a partner rather than a bully.
   Maybe the comparison is true, maybe not. But here’s the impression we are getting from the now: they hate foreigners.
   They might not. Sen. Kerry probably has high-level friends in other governments who support him. I dare say does. The world watches on TV and is getting used to the idea of a , whether she’s black or white. But this whole mess about a company in wanting to acquire a British company that currently operates some seems preposterous.
   For the Democratic Party, it makes everyone there look like xenophobes, unable to see the as a cooperative, modern country which not only is a US ally, but, more fatally, it reverses any of the goodwill Sen. Kerry gained during his campaign.
   In fact, the news portrays the Democrats, including (whom many non-Americans felt gave the Secretary of State a good grilling during her confirmation hearings), as being unable to get past the word in United Arab Emirates; and that by bringing up and the fact that two hijackers were from there, they have become guilty of the very thing they criticized the President about: milking a tragedy for .
   By all means, attack this UAE company if it can be found that it was complicit in terrorism or any other crime, and stop this . But maintain the tradition of .
   The United States has made much of its headway through acquisitions of foreign companies, and the UAE is playing by the same rule book. The legal system in the UAE is actually a combination of traditional , Egyptian law, the tradition and —the last concept being shared with the US. In other words, it’s a pretty that is adhered to well.
   What next? Get all to divest their US interests and sell up? It’s the message being sent around the world in non-US : we can’t see beyond your . And even if you’ve seen the error of your ways (allegations that financing went via the UAE; though remember, too, Al-Qaeda was playing the markets, too) and are now an ally, we won’t forgive you. I wonder if of is wondering about the Democrats right now. Will Britain be next, because, after all, is British, and there were up to nine Britons held at ?
   As a non-American who has no say in whether the Dems or the gets in to the , I welcome those who paint a picture of , not . This is where the Democrats got so many brownie points two years ago—and where the Republicans did not win many . In , there were Americans proud to display their Kerry–Edwards banners. (I saw no one display a Bush–Cheney one.)
   I realize that if you are a diehard Democrat, you are unlikely to switch sides due to this mess; and the same applies to diehard . However, as a , the eyes of the world watch. And this one incident makes us wonder just how either party is. Patriot Act on one side. Xenophobia on the other. Keep up the pettiness, and we might begin to remember that is .

Del.icio.us tags: Democrats | Republicans | politics | globalization | branding | USA | xenophobia
Post a Comment  Links to this post

It’s 2007 already! 

are already, in February, selling 2007 models. This seems daft to me, and another example of companies distancing themselves from .
   I understand that legally, American companies are allowed to do this, but it gives a chance to make a model seem newer than it really is when it comes to resell. But, it might actually help those who are honest enough to stick to a more traditional sense of —BMW, for instance, continues to roll out ’06s right now, as does Volkswagen and Honda.
   “Model years” as a concept is generally unknown outside . The only that tends to come in is the year of registration: if a car is unsold and sits on disused air fields or docks for a year, and only gets registered after it’s been in acid rain, then it’s the later date that gets touted in listings in the and . But even now, retailers are more honest: a 2005 special on Renault Lagunas in New Zealand listed the cars as being 2003-specification models (probably priced too high initially, and new models were on their way).
   Only in the last decade or so have we seen the next year’s models actually offered with that year mentioned as part of the headline—but then, only from September or October, which, traditionally, was the month that the next year’s models emerged in the United States, too.
   Perhaps the whole glitz and of in 1950s never made it out this way, so we don’t use them as selling tools to the consumer.
   As a teenager I seem to recall the next year’s models came out, or at least featured, in August issues of American . The earliest example I can recall where the cars went on sale ultra-early, though I know I am wrong on it being the first, were the General Motors C-cars for 1985 came out the previous March. I think the might have been part of a similar deal, with ’84s coming out mearly.
   But if a car came out earlier, there was always a model half-year in North America—the 1964½ , one of the most famous cars (and successes) of all time; or, for those really into obscurity, the US’s 1970½ Falcon, which lasted about seven months in production.
   Who’s still doing this? . The subsidiary releases a sedan in April as a 2006½. It’s a nice tradition, and I don’t feel quite as cheated. And Kia might as well trade on and warranties, since it can’t really trade on and glamour right now. The Average Joe or Jane seems to appreciate it.

Del.icio.us tags: model years | cars | automobiles | marketing | sales
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Charities have to market 

Having that work deadline this week has meant missing out on some great blog posts. Andrea Weckerle posted on the 22nd at the New Millennium PR blog, one of the best on marketing and PR, ‘In a Perfect World, Charities and Causes Wouldn’t Have to Become Marketers’, outlining how in the real world, charities may have to align with more commercial causes and engage in savvy marketing. I believe I have media properties that want to align with charities. The problem should be easy to solve, but I know I am in a minority, setting up at least one of them because of . Read more of her post here—her links, and what she has to say, inspire a lot of thoughts.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

In the media: the good, the bad and Slick Willy 

It’s not every day I make a woman scream with delight without the involvement of either a very expensive sports car or private behaviour which I won’t detail, but today Lucire gave away a $17,700 necklace by Robinson Designer Goldsmith to a subscriber living in Kerikeri, in rural . Took me over a week to get hold of her, and I wanted to do it during office hours so my staff could overhear. Eventually, we spoke at 6 p.m., after everyone had gone.
   Still, some days, I love being involved in .
   And since TV One, one of the local networks, has not gone ahead to do the announcement, I may as well: watch me live on March 10 on Breakfast, 8.20 a.m. This is one of five network confirmed appearances this coming month. I’m not sure if the other four are covered by confidentiality, so better safe than sorry till I find out for sure, but the first is March 3. If I don’t blog at the end of next week, you’ll know why: I’ll be trying to finish my work before I lose a morning to TV.
   Meanwhile, has beaten me on the number of televised minutes in New Zealand this month, and that was just from a single day walking around shopping for pieces at Höglund Art Glass (disclaimer: a client). Those listening to him speak at the paid c. NZ$2,000 each—which is a bit more than my fee for an hour. Seven of those people could have collectively bought the necklace I gave away today and probably downloaded the 42nd President’s for a bit less. Or, we could have just donated the money to directly. I am sure Mr Clinton would not have minded.
   None of that particularly disturbs me (much) since I have a bias—I make money from , and I am not important enough to need security staff. I do know how much time is spent on preparation. What does worry me are the conditions given to the , according to TVNZ: ‘Media were locked into the event for three hours and not permitted to leave even to use the bathroom. Cameramen were instructed to film in one direction only and were forbidden from asking anyone at the forum what they thought of Clinton’s speech’ (my emphasis).
   In a month where were heavily debated, the rationale given was lame. Said New Zealand’s Prime Minister, , ‘It’s not in New Zealand’s interests for Mr Clinton to be harmed in any way while he’s here on our watch, so the security will be tight.’
   I think the Hon Mr Clinton would have appreciated the opinions of others. Not criticizing would be more harmful—something that he himself lives by when criticizing his successor’s strategy in . Or indeed, any member of the , including Miss Clark herself. It would have been worth asking others just what they thought of the former President’s words. I doubt that someone paying $2,000–$2,500 ($5,000 if you wanted a handshake and pic with the man) would do so to listen to something or someone they disliked. To forbid a journalist from asking questions is like asking an Olympic sprinter to perform with shackled feet.
   And, even though I criticized him for policies in office (which I do with the current President, too), the majority of former President Clinton’s speeches since he became an elder statesman have all been positive, inspiring and motivational. They have led me to say, ‘Why didn’t he talk like this between 1992 and 2000, cutting through the political BS of Capitol Hill?’ (Yes, I know: a naïve question.)
   I have to say that this term, I am not sure what our Prime Minister is talking about. She seems to have replaced her straight-shooting demeanour of her first two terms with Applebyspeak. I might have to ask her to see if her quotation was not taken out of context. I hope so.
   Apparently, some guy called spoke, too. Guess we know who was the man of the moment.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

23.2.06

Global cover age 

It’s nice to get this level of cooperation from the : Lucire Romania’s party last Friday was attended by many of our colleagues, and has hit the pages throughout the country. I’m sure the appearance of , her boyfriend businessman , and celebrity helped, but I credit a great deal to our team there, led by Valentin and Mirella Lapescu.
   The latest issue features Miss Gabor en couverture (left), the first time we’ve had a cover depart from the issues’. The content remains the same, with the addition of some pieces—the was, from the beginning, to create a global title where the features would unite the planet. I still believe we can, even if I have the odd moaning session.
   The rationale this time was that we needed a local , and Miss Gabor was considered to be most worthy. It goes a little away from my vision; however, I back up Mirella and Valentin’s decision: there are reasons behind it, it helped cement us in the eyes of the Romanian , and it was actually quite well shot. They had selected a top , so we were fortunate.
   Such talent does exist in , but the trouble tends to be the small population: finding the top make-up artist, stylist, model and photographer in one place isn’t that easy. Hence, covers tend to be shot in or, very occasionally, .
   While I had some initial resistance to the idea of a separate cover, I have to say I like the egotistical element. Having a with the same cover (albeit in different languages) gives a feeling of satisfaction that your principles are being propagated. Having a magazine with different covers appeals directly to the ego, because while you still did the work inside, it gives you the impression that you did twice as much. In this day and age, however, where Business Week has given up the idea of separate editions, I believe my original idea is right.
   Therefore, the New Zealand and editions, whose covers are presently photographed by Gray Scott of Veritas Management, should share their cover image, due to the quality of Gray’s work. A long time ago, we received some criticism that we should put on local was even suggested in the early days, though she has since emigrated to . However, I question whether she is a “Lucire girl”. I won’t put on a celeb just for the sake of having one on the cover. I am not alone: at one meeting with an ad agency, the idea of Sally Ridge, who had appeared on a cover months before, was universally panned. is the only “face” that comes close, and she knows this, but we haven’t been able to work out when, where, how and by whom. To date, we still have not shot a cover in New Zealand.
   As the New Zealand edition of is the “master edition”, we have to be , supplying to the world—which, regrettably, puts paid to the idea of a celebrity cover featuring a , unless it happened to be a New Zealander who was globally known.
   We haven’t called yet, since I assume we can’t match ’s payments. Ditto .

Del.icio.us tags: Lucire | Romania | media | cover | model | celebrity | New Zealand | fashion magazine | magazine
Post a Comment  Links to this post

22.2.06

New Zealand-owned, really 

There are plenty of studies on research, but is kind of an enigma, even after living here for nearly 30 years. Today, I checked the binding for the next issue of Lucire’s New Zealand edition, and found myself thinking that I should put the nation’s name in there.
   For the magazine’s print history, I had resisted this move. I had been advised to put ‘New Zealand edition’ because no one, I was told, knew that Lucire was from that country. I thought that worked against what the stood for: the world’s first truly , where the stories are shared across all editions (never mind I only had the one print one back then).
   My rationale was also historic. , for example, does not always put the country inside the capital O. Certainly the original edition does not call itself American , even if some of the public does—that would be like saying ‘French ’. is the same. Ditto . So, in this world, why should the lead edition of be called Lucire New Zealand?
   However, we have a problem. Our low opinion of ourselves. The disbelief that, for example, I had the licked when it came to . In print, how could any New Zealander be capable of leading? Ha!
   Despite the successes and , for the first year of the magazine’s print existence in New Zealand, a lot of people thought I had a foreign title. Or that the magazine is foreign. Because I stood on fresh ground that no one had trodden on before, and no one had peed on it. It was too hard to be believed.
   Never mind that with each issue we ran shouting our country of origin: just last month a New Zealander answered our country of origin question on our subscription form with ‘Spain’.
   We have a higher opinion of Spaniards than of ourselves.
   I am just a regular Joe. I’m not a Bill Gates-type figure with inherited money and software patents. So today, I relented a little. The words ‘New Zealand’ appear on the spine of Lucire’s next issue, if the editor-in-chief agrees. We might as well pretend to be a if no one believes we can be a first-tier one.
   What gets me is how many foreign companies do manage to pretend to be Kiwi just by “being average”, including (not ’s one), which might have been started by a New Zealander, but is ultimately owned by the late Kerry Packer’s family in . And the usual: Just Juice, Eta, Griffin’s—all French. Yet a lot of the I know are among the brightest people in the world. Also the most decent, by a country mile. Being first-tier should be normal. Do I just hang around a different crowd?

Del.icio.us tags: country of origin | Lucire | New Zealand | fashion magazines | tall poppy syndrome
Post a Comment  Links to this post

21.2.06

One month 

I have been at my own space for a month as of today. I’m on a work deadline, so there are fewer posts this week, but with 94 posts up after this one, I have the feeling I’ll crack the century by the end of the month.
   It has been what I expected, and more. Thanks to Johnnie Moore, Hugh MacLeod and Kris Sowersby for the encouragement to go it alone, away from my initially sporadic posts at the Beyond Branding Blog. Here, I find I am more myself and explore more issues than I otherwise would. And even though I paid for the web space at the last place, I feel more “ownership” here. Good ol’ .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

What not to wear 

The affair boils down to some very simple things. Most readers of this blog know I have little time for and the record of (whose flag is not shown at left). I had another meeting with the government rep yesterday (see earlier blog entry), and wore a suit to which I customarily affix a Kuomintang lapel pin—featuring the standard from the ’s flag.
   The decision to publish or not to publish is the same as the decision to wear or not to wear.
   The thought process should have been akin to this: (a) this gentleman might get offended; (b) I don’t know his views, but it’s best to play it safe so we can have a ; (c) not all Chinese agree with what the does; (d) I might as well take it off, because I stand to gain more when we are chatting on friendly terms. This man is not my enemy. He is a potential friend. He approached me for a business deal. Our personal politics do not come in to it.
   I’d rather effect change through personal . Nothing would be gained by angering him—it would only piss me off, too. As it so happened, we had a very good and open chat about business. I voiced my concerns about in Red China.
   However, I will publish what I see fit. I felt I got that across. I believe he doesn’t feel a like Lucire can get too political. Even the Chinese living within the confines of the are eager to see that is critical, or, rather, honest. Marxism, after all, is not a Chinese word. If anything, I’m in allegiance with the will of the people of China. Just not the government.
   After we parted, I put my lapel pin back on. I’m back, writing away and taking advantage of living in a .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

20.2.06

Jedi a petrol price 

In January, I predicted that the per-litre price for in would hit $2. Transport energy specialist and doctoral candidate Michael Saunders agrees with me, as reported in The New Zealand Herald today, but for different (though related) reasons to those I outlined:

Mr Saunders, studying for a PhD at the University of Sao Paulo, said the current imbalance in supply and demand meant there will be no end to increasing , leaving New Zealand vulnerable to massive balance of payment deficits. New Zealand’s debt blowout last September caused by rising oil import costs made news around the world, he said.

I still wonder what it will take for people to realize the message sent by the experts out there.
   Plus, shouldn’t we band together, send out a mass email, where everyone listed on it (name and town are noted) demands (or a nominated —I use BP hypothetically) sells us at a fixed price, say $1·10 a litre (where the company can still )? Fiftieth person forwards the finished email to BP. If there are enough of us doing it—say the number gets to 25,000 in New Zealand—then BP might get the message.
   Acceptance of the deal would mean BP stations carry a list of those on the mass email can receive a set discount on their petrol, on presentation of their driver’s licence and evidence of location.
   If it is worried, it could limit the deal to certain days.
   I suggest this because we all have the power to negotiate the prices of many things that we once took as untouchable. How about it? Shall we experiment? Are there enough of us to do a national ?
   After all, in March 2001, managed to forward an email asking atheists to note down as their religion in the , as an experiment to see if it could get it recognized. It caused sufficient stir for the Statistics’ Department to say it would not recognize such a declaration (even though it would be declared as legal and truthful by the person filling in his or her ), and for the BBC and other media to get hold of the story. There is even a Wikipedia entry on the phenomenon.
   We’re willing to do it for something silly—then, maybe the way of the Jedi is not so silly—so why not act the same way for something serious?
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Ad agency emails client, loses account 

The anti- movement will love this one. I can’t name names, but if I get my hands on the message, I’ll be sharing it, complete with information on its writer.
   One of my staff (I won’t even name the country, but I guess your odds of getting it right are one in three) presents in front of a potential client’s . She recounts ’s online record of being more highly ranked in Alexa and Google than vogue.com. Ad agency person does not believe her and stops short of calling her a liar, even though all the facts are independently verifiable—just because the agency is ignorant of .
   Agency emails client to rubbish Lucire staff member and the in general.
   Client drops agency because it senses the agency is out of touch and can’t face facts.
   One criticism I give of in this blog is that they fail to adjust to a more wired world. Rather than adapt, they try to pull the new world down—a Wall Street Journal article highlighted by Johnnie Moore and others is representative. And just because this agency hadn’t given a damn about the until my staff member visited it, it tries to pull down not only one title, but the entire medium.
   I wonder if this is typical. Let’s hope not, for the clients’ sake. If it doesn’t even get Web 1·0, then it has no hope in . Fortunately for us, this client acted by pulling its custom. Good guys 1, bad guys 0. It now does its directly.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

18.2.06

Changing the world, one step at a time 

Jim Hancock asked himself how we can sustain movements that we know the needs. I write and run a few groups here and there, but he and the International Justice Mission (which does sound like a league of comic-book heroes) went one further:

The solution was finding a way to see the world through the eyes of someone who wasn’t so numb to pain and hope. That turned out to be four American kids who were alert and articulate (and possessed a significant emotional vocabulary). We took them to for ten days—to look over their shoulders and into their eyes as they became eyewitnesses to .

   The IJM, which has been successful at extracting children out of and has done other noble things, hosted the trip.
   The result is a video-based curriculum that Jim produced called The Justice Mission. It has a , which oddly turns some people off in —and it shouldn’t. The motivation is exactly in line with what we all want for this planet: fairness, justice and peace.
   Jim feels it’s only one step because the numbers are too great, but that we should focus on the task at hand, rather than the statistics. I hope it is another effort that begins for the better, because, as Alan Hirsch points out in a post by Steve Addison, the of western means it is harder for huge to take place these days. Now, if only we could all these movements together at one site, and to do so equally, so we know we are not alone …
    Global Movements, anyone? It’ll be a good way to undo the damage last month with the of results in .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

When slogans fail 

My research showed that a slogan only works if it is memorable, pithy, and aimed at both internal and external audiences—used in place of a vision statement. However, what sort of slogan is ‘Where customer satisfaction is not an option,’ pointed out by Markoos?
   It’s for a Ford–Mercury dealership in Wisconsin. Not many happy days with this slogan for internal or external audiences.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Question convention 

Dave Pollard advances in How to Save the World that the predisposes us to a sense of . , we are communicated, solve our problems, and that we should join them to fix them; is not championed.
   These aren’t Dave’s words exactly, and they are a crude summary (it’s best to read his post), but there is a lot of truth to his view. At , we were usually more impressed with cases that involved KFC or General Electric or Xerox, not the regular guy in the same town who was exporting 90 per cent of his products, taking risks.
    may be more fortunate in that there are papers that deal with the smaller companies. Although I had disagreements with some of the course content at the time, the 200-level paper at Victoria University had elements on and entrepreneurship. I know that AUT in Auckland even has a Stanford grad as an entrepreneurship professor.
   However, it didn’t stop the same phenomenon from happening, which Dave writes as:

So we have people coming out of high and university who must rely on finding menial corporate jobs or exploiting connections in high places to get plum jobs they don’t deserve, since they cannot provide for themselves. They do not know how to ‘make a living’.

Ergo, most of the folks in my class wanted to join big firms. No point stressing out for yourself and being your own person. Very few wanted to make a real change in a smaller outfit. Same at : join a big firm and get lost in the paperwork.
   Yet all great , including the western ones, were founded on a sense of and entrepreneurship. History has shown us that. And we can only stay ahead of the curve and keep high if we continue to and create .
   I agree with Dave that there’s no conspiracy per se, but the right things aren’t getting communicated. In most things, we are not helpless, but we are trained to be, so we don’t question the communiqués of . And maybe we should question. Question . It’s the only way to break through the that limits so many of us.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

17.2.06

Toward an internet that talks at you only 

is one of the smartest guys in the world. And when he speaks, we should take heed. Right now, he is concerned that the “read–write” is becoming a “read-only” one, where are using it to further their own , away from the of people. As reported at if:book:

The cable and phone companies believe that since it’s through their physical infrastructure that the flows, that they should be able to control how it flows. They want the right to shape the flow of culture to best fit their ideal architecture of . You can see, then, how if they had it their way, the internet would come to look much more like an service than the vibrant two-way medium we have today: simply because it’s easier to make money from read-only than from read/write—from broadcast than from public access.

   The law of , too, is being moved away from the idea of authorship to one where can be formed—something that has been creeping in over the last century. And that can only be bad for creativity, and for . It’s more reason the internet should not reflect our less than stellar world—but be an ideal, frontier for the of all .
   I’d like to hear what we can do about this. My most ready suggestion is being aware and voting with your dollars away from corporations that have a tendency to control “our” .

Del.icio.us tags: internet | media | profit | copyright | monopoly | culture | creativity | democracy
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Managing Brand Beckham 

The Independent today has an article on how the of player adds value to the team of . Beckham is referred to as a ‘ phenomenon’, and he probably is: from dolls to football shirts, though no Simpsons cartoon voices yet.
   Or, put another way, Real has a personification of its in Beckham, with all its inherent risks (fiction in , his performance each season). However, it means a team cannot just manage its on-field performance and its games. It must adopt all the trappings of , gauging reactions, and analysing its . It needs to inject glamour to pump up its players, and Beckham’s marriage to a is Real’s Heaven-sent gift, where the glamour was already there when United sold the player for a reported £20 million.
   In football, or any sport, brand management is tougher, because the cannot be planned as readily. Personal branding is less refined as a discipline, though there are tools (such as Managing Brand Me). It is truly dependent on people: specifically, it is dependent on their manner and . In which case, a football team brand may be one of the most easily affected ones out there: fans will react instantly to rumour and misreporting, a bad game, or real misbehaviour off the pitch. here could be one of the easier parts of the whole process.
   Bottom line, however, is this: a is very much like a personal brand. Behave in line with the values you say you have, and all is well. Go against it, and there will be reactions. And, the more and you reach, the more you can affect your brand’s —and is something that David Beckham brings to the table in droves.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Re-earning respect 

These days, I have joined the throng of those saying there are , forces at work in the . And I have come across these biases in my daily work in the media—but I have to take this into context: many believe the media seem to have a force that opposes their beliefs.
   I can cite study after study of bias, but some of these studies are linked to conservatives. Not long ago, I came across one from California, although Johnnie Moore dug a little deeper and found that the researcher had affiliations (see his link here).
   It wasn’t that long ago when I heard, however, complaints about involvement in media, and that they tended toward the . That worked for the administration (plus, you can’t spell Sawyer without sway). There was a feeling of conservatism in The Evening Post in in the early 1990s—I have practically made the opposite charge of late.
   Why these of bias? Partially, I believe the media to be responsible. They have shown that they are not on the side of truth, but on the side of sales. The affair, blogged here, is an example. I chatted about and ’s deaths with my team today, and how some of the captions to photographs were pure fiction.
   People talk. And the truth gets out. If there is no , then naturally that is replaced by .
   Media are coming to the table not with clean hands, but an existing image of inaccuracy held by audiences. If that is to change, then media need to get real about their standards.
   Otherwise, there’s going to be room for a service which attempts to be truly , perhaps automated by algorithms that measure . It could stem off Google News, or someone else might want to give the Californian boys a run for their money.
   Media will survive—even —if they deliver what people want. That, to me, means depth, and relevance. No more stories on and , please, because ultimately, they don’t serve anyone. It’s time to re-earn the public’s trust.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

A diplomatic diplomat 

Maybe the are reading this blog. And decided that statesmanship begins at home.
   I had an interesting evening meeting with an official of the today, for business. No mention was made of some of the things I’ve been saying (such as at this link), though according to his interpreter they had seen me in one of the newspapers. Apparently, I have a ‘reputation’ in Red and they have heard of Lucire.
   I was up front enough to tell him that I was descended from Kuomintang members. Instead of opposition, I had a lovely reaction about traditions, and even a discussion about superstition.
   There are two ways to win someone’s support. One is to take the abusive route, which the former Red Chinese ambassador to this nation took with me. The other is to act like an adult. I have to say I was impressed. Maybe they have been reading this blog and taking things to heart. Who knows?
   I might not change my views about self-determination and , but like in all things, a is a start. And tonight, I had a dialogue.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

15.2.06

Web 3·0 and the Book of Revelation 

Tim Kitchin blogged a few days ago about at Steal This Brand. Makes some sense: as , we try to get a lot of people acting as one person—the . So, if is about and , then the next iteration may take on a persona that includes certain traits. The of fun sounds ominous:

All of the assets you currently share ‘for fun’ are going to be commercialisable assets, and the GYM club are going to be creating competing but interoperable trading mechanisms to reward you for those assets.

   Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft may want to own us, just like those that an American company uses to track its employeeswhich some feel was covered in the .
   In the 21st century, let’s tread carefully out there and support things outside the large firms. The sometimes has to begin with our choices.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

14.2.06

When the public works 

Last Sunday’s International Herald–Tribune had an interesting editorial on the disparity emerging in . While and the are booming, adding one million jobs, the is not; and if one is born female, expect to have a harder life than a male baby. Kevin Watkins writes that if girls had the same death rates as boys, 130,000 deaths would be averted.
   Fortunately, India is on the case. There is legislation for $2·5 billion spending to target poor rural areas with programmes. Mr Watkins does not underestimate what a massive change is still needed, but it signals that the is responsible. It has made money from tech; now it is time to see if a can begin economically through prudent . This is simple with an unmissable opportunity.
   I would not be the least bit surprised if, by 2050, the top cities in the world are Dubai, Mumbai, Singapore, Budapest and New Delhi. The trick is to keep a in sight. managed to, so we know India can do it for the betterment of the entire nation. Short-term ideas and three- to five-year turnarounds in don’t help any nation.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Blog from your heart 

My friend Jonar Nader, the author of the frightening novel Z, told me that despite , there are still around seven stories that go around the world. I have yet to see an news channel cover, for example, the problems going on in Nepal and there saying they could execute the king. A check of indicates that the biggest story today is Vice-President shooting his partner. Conclusion: people are no better informed now than at any other time in history.
   It’s tempting to hop on the bandwagon. I got annoyed with the affair and blogged three times about it. This gave me a lot of hits, more than the Beyond Branding Blog from which this one grew. And I can imagine what other might think in those shoes: about and complementing the will get me hits. I will continue—because as a blogger, I would like to be heard. I’ll cover their stories ahead of mine.
   Dick accidentally shooting a guy is about as interesting as Fred Smith accidentally shooting a guy. I’ve only mentioned it by way of example, and yes, I’ve linked it so I can get a few extra hits. But it is not the focus of this . It’s not the story that interests me beyond this example—other than a joke I cracked a couple of days ago about the President’s desire for beginning with . It’s a start.
   As bloggers, I believe we should uncover our own stories, as at OhmyNews.com. The world is more interesting if we report on the things that we are passionate about. and specialist exist for that reason; and if there are conspiracies behind governments and —the cartoon affair indicated there certainly is meddling and that the reasons officially advanced on both sides are probably untrue—then we would do well to not fall into their trap.
   So, really, what are interesting today? We are all important, as are our voices and what impacts on each of us. One of the best finds for me this month is Jeff Risley’s blog—because he writes from the heart. Our , our and our lives are, in my view, as deserving (if not more deserving) of coverage on our respective blogs as some guy who, this time around, was a .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Sometimes you never know 

In December, I scripted a for Lucire. Yes, I could have farmed this out to someone, but I enjoy doing the for my own properties. In this case, it was fine last December, but now that it’s about to go on air, it might be a little inappropriate, and was the subject to a quick change. Plus the pronunciation of had to be tweaked so the r was not trilled in the VO. Wait till the last line of male dialogue and let me know what you think.

Lucire radio advertisement by the Radio Network, MP3 (466 kbyte)
Post a Comment  Links to this post

13.2.06

A union with Iran 

On Johnnie Moore’s Weblog today, there is a link to The Observer, where it was discussed that in were denied permission to form their own . They proceeded anyway. The government’s reaction:

The company's managers and called in the who arrested the union's six officers and beat workers until they agreed to renounce the strike. Bravely, the majority refused. The state's thugs then targeted their wives and children.

   These same thugs belong to the same group who added three extra of by their own standards—to get annoyed by accusing the west of creating them.
   In , the there is likely to result in some form of uprising, if their interests are not seen to. Paying 20¢ an hour in is hardly the sign of a fair nation. It was through years of abuse of the poor by the that saw to the overthrow of empire in in favour of a democratic republic in 1911. In , there appears to be a gulf between and , if some of the few reports making it out of the country, and through , are accurate. And if these abuses of everyday continue, then things on the inside are boiling more than the west has been reporting—never mind what its is.
   Brooding Persian looks at everyday life in Iran and alludes to the corruption of some government officials and the spin emerging from Teheran; Iranian Prospect, in a slightly guarded style (given who might be watching) believes that some governments were behind the Mohammed cartoon protests. We need to take heed of what is emerging from , because some of these writers are putting a great deal at risk: some 20-something have even been arrested, according to the BBC.
   Once again, dialogue can help us. If we find out the truth, we can make up our minds about what people are going through within the country. We don’t have to rely as much on to paint an accurate picture, when we have who are willing to share—and, in some cases, risking their and safety to share.

Del.icio.us tags: Iran | corruption | union | bloggers | citizen media | blogging | Mohammed cartoons
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Why I don’t use Firefox 

I’ve had a full-on day away from The Persuader Blog (which is actually quite healthy sometimes—as I could probably spend all day here), and will have a few posts coming up. But one thing struck me today: and how, after so many iterations, it still cannot support some common characters.
   This is a problem for a . Specifically, Firefox and 6 and 7 do not support and double quote marks properly. Before you send me a lot of emails about this, let me share this: I run a system, and friends have sent me screen shots from their so I know they are OK. I also run . But regardless of whether I use Type 1, or , ligatures and double quote marks always show up in another font in Firefox.
   Here’s how this page shows up in Firefox (ligatures highlighted—note the different heights and weights; the quote marks are too small to be noticeably different at this reduced size):



   I have sent for Firefox and Netscape, to no avail. But I experience these things on three different Windows of three different vintages with three different settings—so I refuse to believe I am alone.
   It’s been my life: to buy bits and pieces and find that my situation is not in an , or that personnel have never come across it before.
   Except I’m beginning to doubt that I am unique in that way. And I am sure that when things go belly-up with your computer, tech support or makes you feel like you are the only person in the world who has had that problem, no matter how polite the rep is. The only exception I can recall off-hand are the people at Rackspace, who always go out of their way to help, and never make me feel I have a problem they have not seen before.
   I’ve had to reinstall many times; I still can’t access LinkedIn using ; and for years I told that it was the wind that was causing my to the disbelief of the support staff (I was eventually proven right, but it took over two years). Last year, between three people and two support people in two countries (well, Australia never answered, so you had better make that one support person in one country), it took us 90 minutes to figure out how to burn a data CD on Mac OS X because the CD-ROM icon did not show up as it was meant to, and as it was described in every single manual and book we had.
   I’m not asking an awful lot of the manufacturers—just use the same set of standards. I don’t want to open Firefox for LinkedIn, and Maxthon or IE for the other sites: that is ridiculous. I don’t care about the politics behind and : I am a regular Joe who wants the products simply to work. In your manuals, write in English—not . And keep forums so we can go and solve our own problems and not bug you. Track the conversations there so you can answer my questions when I call—too often I have come to you and you are clueless, but I eventually find it answered, after having different keywords, by a regular person on a forum who fluked his or her solution. When I am on these forums, don’t have your staff insult me for trying to help other customers when you fail to.
   I believe solve problems, so I will be interested to hear if anyone out there has ever come across my Firefox problem. There is still nothing on Google, and this problem has been around since Netscape 6. Surf over to the post where the above screen shot was taken here and see if you have the problem: it’ll make me feel better.
   The reality that I have come to realize is that the public seems to be able to help me more than any department can usually, even when I have paid for it. At the very least I won’t feel alone.

Del.icio.us tags: Firefox | Mozilla | browsers | technical support | customer service | typography
Post a Comment  Links to this post

12.2.06

How to Save the World (and other blogs) 

Nick Smith has posted to say he’ll be back next week at the Life 2·0 blog, so while he’s away I began going through his blogroll. It’s an impressive collection, considering Nick’s blog is relatively new (though older than mine). I commend readers to check it out: based on our posts, Nick and I see eye to eye on why we are here on this planet, but I have not had as varied a blog-reading experience as he has had.
   Among the collection is the Salon blog, How to Save the World, Jack/Zen, and BrainFuel—all of which are intelligent, content-laden destinations. Life 2·0 is here.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

I didn’t graduate from Evil Medical School 

At the Emergence Marketing blog, I came across the Gematriculator, a program that claims to calculate how good or evil a web site is, using the principles of Gematria, described at this New Zealand page.
   I was encouraged to find that Lucire is 69 per cent good, and that Jack Yan & Associates is 67 per cent good; however, this site is only 61 per cent good, so I must be putting a bit of evil in here myself. In fact, I am more evil than the New Zealand Labour Party.
   It’s probably all a load of cobblers since Dr Evil scores 72 on the goodness scale and the Labour Party outranks the Dalai Lama, but there is still fun to feeding in sites and seeing how they do. The top and bottom ones on this list are interesting.
99 The Vatican: the Holy See
88 The British Labour Party
87 The Medinge Group
87 The Conservative Party (UK)
84 Beyond Branding
81 Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton
81 New Zealand Labour Party
78 The Carter Center
77 News Corp.
76 His Holiness the Dalai Lama
74 Halliburton
69 Lucire
69 US Republican Party
64 National Party of New Zealand
52 The White House
50 China.org.cn
49 Vogue
48 Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
43 US Democratic Party
27 Satanism 101 portal
Judge for yourself here.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

11.2.06

Dodge Down Under: it’ll work this time 

is about to enter the markets with its own . This time, it’ll work, as the company has defined its brand cleverly enough and incorporated that thinking into its products—with the Caliber and Nitro the first cars to début.
   The comes from Dodge’s desire to be ‘unapologetically American’—we read that as ‘bold’ when the idea was first discussed by Chrysler VP . Look past the marketing talk and you realize this statement is not equalled by other :

In describing the Dodge brand, Eberhardt outlined how the brand will expand globally as the company intends to reinforce its brand with full-of-life, street-smart people with strong self-expressive tendencies who like to drive bold, powerful and .

   Which means Dodges will have hairy chests and that trucks will remain an important part of the .
   Plus, there are enough weaned on American TV shows to know what a Dodge is—not to mention the heyday of the Charger, Challenger, and even the Coronet and Monaco. The sign of the ram is not unfamiliar, and certain Dodge trucks have been officially sold Down Under, albeit in limited numbers.
   The last Dodge to sell in any numbers, in at least, were locally assembled versions of the Commer PB van, by now called the Dodge Spacevan, in the late 1970s—hardly a good use of the Dodge Brothers’ name, jarring with the American . At least the Dodge pick-up, or ute in antipodean parlance, was based on the Chrysler Valiant, closer to an American concept.
   Dodge’s latest approach is far more convincing than what has been doing in Europe with . Chevrolet, to everyone, is American. GM Arabia positions it as an American brand, even if the products come from Australia and Korea; GM South Africa does the same. ’s approach ignores the brand’s existing and its pre-Daewoo European range of trucks—not a smart move when trying to .
   Dodge’s failure in the past to crack these markets had to do with a mix of issues and less than inspiring products. Few models were built in .
   They also did not express the antipodeans held about American cars. While the reality is that Americans buy compacts and intermediates like the and , stay for a long time. It’s why the Chrysler 300C has done well: it’s the long-held idea of a butch American vehicle, continuing a tradition of sedans sold Down Under including the AMC Rebel, Chevrolet Impala and Ford Galaxie 500.
   The Caliber may be an American car in a compact form, but its expresses the notion of American trucks and , also part of the image—thanks in part to television (and in part to , with its Explorer).
   ’s previous entry with Dodge products, in the pre-Daimler era, saw the Neon and Caravan sold as the Chrysler Neon and Chrysler Voyager. The Neon failed to convince buyers—despite a generous specification, the engine was too large to be a credible Honda Civic rival; and the was not on a par with two-litre Vectras and Mondeos. Other products such as the Intrepid—which probably would have given the full-size cars a run for their money—never made it into right-hand drive.
   Only the -built Voyagers—closer to the Caravan with its cross grille than the Plymouth Voyager—managed to make any headway, and that was due to a market with few and a continued love affair with the . The Opel Sintra was never offered Down Under, and the Renault Espace was overpriced.
   Dodge promises it will introduce every six months Down Under, which equates to the period in which have been shown to get bored of a product range. In other words, Dodge will ensure there’ll be decent .
   It might not become overnight—but recall that started in these parts with only the LS 400. And it had no image to build on. had its Batman Begins moment with the Favorit. As long as there is a , and you’d expect to have one after many uncertain years, then Dodge will become more familiar than the Korean .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Future imperfect 

Ah, remember when visions of the future were more far-fetched and imaginative? When designers took it upon themselves to advance, rather than regurgitate? The space-age of moon living, flying cars, inflatable chairs?
   The FutureWire blog linked to the 2001–2 site called Retro Future, which reminds viewers of those heady days. Things haven’t been quite so heady and hopeful since the started connecting people in a big way 10 years ago.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Yahoo! and Google kowtow—would I? 

I thought about the above question today. Would I enter the market with my products? Probably, but unlikely. There is some call for it at the moment, and we have had partner firms investigate the possibility for at least one of my businesses, but my heart is never in it. So would I cooperate with authorities of an unelected whose publicly insult me to disclose the names and other of my customers? Not on your life.
   The more I think about it, the more I dislike these decisions to compromise your and your very essence for the sake of .
   The argument even I advanced was that cooperating with the legal of one nation was better than not providing your service to its nationals. It is also better, I thought, for people to go to than to or a , Chinese-owned service. But what is the difference now? And what damage does that do to the when is because, history tells us, this is likely to happen? Would you like to be a ?
   While Baidu and others might make it outside China—they already serve many—hypothetically, I would rather have the support of all my existing customers, who create enough of a groundswell that future will opt for my service. Let them crave for it now—in Google’s case it had a for . When freedom rings, be there for the people. Watch the queues like ’s did when it first opened.
   These institutions are not legal, per se. The is not elected. It fails the most basic requirement of membership in the —that the nation state be .
   It might mean I will miss out on some dollars. But while I run this firm, I will have a . If our products go into Red China, then I doubt I will change my tune. If compelled to change, I will make the decision to withdraw.

Del.icio.us tags: Google | China | Yahoo! | branding | brands | human rights | democracy | freedom
Post a Comment  Links to this post

They’re corporations, Tom, but not as we know them 

Every time there’s some mess in the regarding the nomination of judges, someone brings up the of the nation and what they intended in the . The Matrix radio station in , (107·5 MHz) has been doing its rounds with of late and it may be worth remembering just what the Founding Fathers thought of .
   As summarized at Norma Sherry’s site:

Before our , the [Americas] were governed by Britain. Two companies, the East India Tea Company and the Hudson Bay Company[,] ramrodded their will upon the businessman and in actuality were the true rulers of the early colonists. As for Great Britain, it was distracted in numerous battles and wars with countries in Europe. Not until its victory in 1763 with France in the Seven Years’ War, or the French and Indian War, did Britain give the [Americas] the full weight of its attention.

   The was a corporate abuser and had Parliament enact laws so it could have a monopoly on tea. With this fresh in mind, the constitutional conventions took place. (The same Company later demanded that in exchange for Chinese tea, it would trade opium rather than currency or metals—and tried to get as many Chinese hooked on drugs as possible. When they could not sail in during the Opium War, the American Forbes family did.)
   While and one other supported the idea of corporations—at least for creating projects for the public good—others opposed it. I hope Ms Sherry permits me to cite a slightly bigger chunk this time (my emphasis):

It is the accumulation of disgust for the mentality that prompted Thomas Jefferson to proclaim, “I hope we shall take warning from the example of England and crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations which dare already to challenge our Government to trial, and bid defiance to the laws of our country”[.]
   Therefore, when our founding fathers deliberated on the text and content of our Constitution, the despicable maneuverings of the East India Tea Company and other British corporations favored high in their collective memories. This new country was going to assure corporations would know their place.
   … In the beginning, and for many years of the , corporations could exist only if they were granted a charter by the state in which they would conduct business.
   … were issued with the combined approval of the and the . … Rules were clearly defined and any deviation would result in the revocation of the charter; likewise, if their operating conditions were unacceptable, this too would result in the loss of their charter. If the corporation was dissolved its assets were divided among its .
   … Incorporated were not permitted to land holdings or make any political contributions or attempt to influence legislation. They could not purchase or own stock in other corporations. They were strictly and explicitly charted for the purpose of serving the .


   To put it in modern parlance, corporations could only exist with a charter and strict . I understand the American was born with such corporations (though one could debate the operating conditions for workers), and when one examines the growth of and , there were notions of , with constant innovation as the means through which that could be achieved.
   So while we dig out and argue the Founding Fathers for everything from filibusters to the appointment of US Cabinet members, we don’t seem to dig them out too often when there are corporate abuses and .
   Yes, the laws have changed since these formative steps, but we ignore their origins at our peril. Just as America was formed because of a chasm between the ruling class and everyday people, some corporations—not just American ones—may cause itself. The battle, this time, will not be fought over nations, but .
   The more word of abuses get out, the more likely will react against the perpetrators. And in some cases, the solutions are so simple: an extra quarter-dollar on a pair of shoes, compliance with basic laws on . For consumers now expect corporations to reflect their , just like they were meant to in the beginning—why else is telling people that it is installing solar panels in some stations and reusing water from its car washes? And if they find out the promise has been broken, wait for it to spread on virally, or for it to appear on . Keep the promise and watch dividends grow, as well as customer bases in unexpected places—the places that one has helped.

Del.icio.us tags: corporations | history | USA | CSR | social responsibility
Post a Comment  Links to this post

A time for acceptance 

It’s hard to quote a politician without some people getting steamed up, but the exchange of views between and HM of at the made a lot of sense, in particular His Majesty’s statement on and ’s commonalities, which are stronger than any differences we might have.
   Rather than quote everyday bloggers this time, I quote King Abdullah—whom, incidentally, is descended directly from the prophet :

And we have to continue to ask ourselves, what type of world do we want for our children? I too often hear the word used as, . And tolerance is such an awful word. If we are going to strive to move forward in the future, the word that we should be talking about is acceptance. We need to accept our common and our . And I hope that lessons can be learned from this dreadful issue, that we can move forward as humanity, and truly try to strive together, as friends and as , to bring a better to all.

   The full press statements between the President and His Majesty from February 8 can be found here (thanks to Gina Cobb for the link). A video link at the RNC can be found here.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

10.2.06

Lawyers should be nice 

I can’t divulge the company names involved here but it involves a friend of mine running a web site. It has a forum. Copyrighted images were posted there, not that he wished that to happen. Now the owner is on his case, which is fine, as I would be, too, in their shoes.
   They want to know who posted the material (the poster is anonymous, and he doesn’t host his own board). They also want the post to be removed ASAP.
   He wrote back politely to the to ask what he could do to assist and got a fairly nasty reply back. It told him to seek legal advice and it would not comment on the 1976.
   A better solution would have been to advise my friend of how they both could move forward.
   It seemed pretty obvious that the client and lawyer didn’t have a clue on how these forums worked, and my friend does not know that much about copyright law. Perfect: an opportunity to .
   The lawyer could do this without breaching . After all, by working together, they might be able to find a solution to tracking down the anonymous poster. It’s in the client’s best interests. If my friend merely deleted the file as they demanded, both parties would never be able to trace the poster—not without a degree in advanced computing, anyway, or full access to the hosting company’s logs. Right now, that isn’t an option. It’s like asking for a gold-plated toilet: it’s possible, but it isn’t particularly viable.
   My friend could propose a solution such as warnings on his forum that would keep the happy long-term. And the lawyer should agree, if he really was serving his client.
   But no: the approach is the name of the game in the , and it isn’t limited to the .
   We have had to patrol a lot of web sites over the years for our own material, and that of my colleagues. We might learn of an infringing web site, for example. All the “hard” approaches of my colleagues tended to fail, or at least it did not get the result they wanted without raising the blood pressure of all involved.
   We would write in, explaining the situation, how little the original owners made off their work to begin with, and could they please remove certain files?
   Within a few hours I had agreeable responses. Occasionally, they would comment on my colleagues’ approach and how impolite they had been.
   Cooperation and aren’t solutions just for misunderstandings. They can help you on copyright matters.
   All my friend now has is a sour taste with the publishing company’s titles, thereby damaging their . Which is good for me, since the more people know they are run by a bunch of idiots, the happier I’ll be.
   I hope that if we were to ever hire lawyers and take matters out-of-house, we won’t deal with idiots who opt for tactics first. We have a few pretty good ones we use in New York and yes, they do advise me occasionally for free—because now I have become an even more loyal client.
   Sounds to me like this lawyer is getting everyone mad so he has more . I’ll be noting his name to avoid him in the future. He probably watched too much LA Law when he was training.

Del.icio.us tags: law | lawyers | professional conduct | ethics | brands | cooperation | dialogue | copyright | intellectual property | copyright infringement
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Yahoo! aids jailing of civil servant 

has given 35-year-old civil servant an eight-year prison sentence—after provided the with data on him. The crime was apparently ‘subversion of state power’—which I take to mean the guy had an opinion and stated it on the . Reporters sans Frontières (link thanks to Starling Hunter) calls him a who has been , and lists him with , a who got 10 years thanks to Yahoo!-supplied .
   I have not been a fan of Yahoo! over some of its recent actions, as it has lost the sense of its original . The two-guys-in-a-garage disappeared long ago. It might be argued that when Google caved in to demands, it as well with regard to its —even if surveys disagree with me. Yahoo! is not exactly endearing itself in trying to recover its brand: I can actually understand (but do not endorse) from Google’s point of view, but to actually be part of imprisonments offends me.
   The company could even have some of its data—how would, after all, the Internet Security Bureau of the Politburo know? Blame it on the computer—Yahoo! is pretty good at doing that, after all. The solution was simple: just subject these Bureau folks to the sort of it gave me and Atul Chitnis, and lose them just like it lost us.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Time to Lego 

Starling Hunter, a professor based in the , has compiled a list of the countries Danish goods on his blog—but notes that there are coming to ’s rescue:

A counter-boycoot [sic] has begun in the designed to encourage the sales of goods, presumably to help Danish make up for lost revenues from sales in countries. A search on the term “‘Buy Danish’ + boycott” in returns almost 54,00[0] hits. Among the top results is End the Boycott which carries a list of Danish products, a list of other campaigns and other facts about Denmark.

   So while the are taking place, it’s over to , netizens and some members of the running a campaign. It doesn’t appear to have any official connection to Denmark, HRH Crown , or any .
   It might not save Danish companies from losing overall, but like all things in the online world, it represents voices. voting not with dollars, but with wishes and words.
   I might not like what did, but I don’t think a blanket banning of Danish goods gets at the right people. It only causes resentment. Evidently, there are enough people who feel the same way.
   I would only support a ban on goods if the company itself had wronged and remained unapologetic—which also ties in to giving a proper voice. And a lot of Danish companies have done right by our world—and a -less world would suck.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

The Economist: don’t ignore the blogs 

The twentieth-century might be finally getting that we have gone beyond 2000. As linked from Antony Mayfield’s Open blog, The Economist looks at firms which have either been forced to, or chosen to, deal with who .
   It shows that everyone, in the west, potentially has a voice, which means principles such as the ones we go on about in Beyond Branding, or Living the Brand, or Stefan Engeseth’s One are more important. These have a similar theme: work with your customers and help them achieve their goals.
   Companies that do that are rewarded with stronger brand equity, more reasons to buy (if they know you are helping them with aiding their , as well as supplying goods and products), and even faster processes.
   Companies that don’t are in for a hard time—namely criticism from their . A new program used by Evolve24 claims to be able to analyse to see how a company’s rates, according to .
   The (as it is registered) details the issue with Diebold, but even better known, to me, is the damage that caused to and ’s career. Sadly for Mr Rather, people will remember before they remember his long career.
   ‘Increasingly, companies are learning that the best defence against these attacks is to take blogs seriously and fix rapidly whatever problems they turn up,’ writes The Economist’s correspondent.
   The article puts into quote marks, though, as if it were a hackneyed term. It is a danger I mentioned with : the term has been abused in some cases, for the sake of excusing or hiding corporate misconduct. I fear going down the same route, but it may well have begun.
   We just have to keep hammering away at the real meanings of words like and , in the hope that their tools are properly used. Humankind has an odd way of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, when branding remains one of the most powerful tools that can be exploited for the best, most noble reasons.

Del.icio.us tags: blogging | corporations | corporate social responsibility | consumer movement
Post a Comment  Links to this post

9.2.06

Potential new worlds, at the rate of a blog a second 

It must be satisfying as a founder to see this: Dave Sifry, the man behind , released his ‘State of the Blogosphere’ a few days ago. It’s been picked up by most , but I wanted to highlight one statistic: a new is created every second. In the time I have taken to type and proof this, and add the links, a few hundred blogs have sprung up.
   It means more than a million blogs a year, and I am sure the rate will increase. If each one of these has influence over his or her of people, then we might see some real change.
   The whole affair has brought me into contact with regular and , thereby passing the lies of governments, extremists and media. Forming these networks remind me once again of the promise of the as a force, something that we are in danger of forgetting as the web tries to mirror the of the real world.
   The must remain a frontier where there are no borders, for otherwise there would be no purpose to it. It would simply be another boring that adds to the din, stress and confusion of everyday life. Through the web, we should rightly perceive someone halfway across the world as a neighbour, because for the first time in our lives, it is now possible. We might actually create and make a better place.

Del.icio.us tags: blogging | unity | blogosphere
Post a Comment  Links to this post

A war veteran at 13 

I have blogged about in some developing countries, at least in a peripheral sense, abused by the quest for the dollar for shareholders in a faraway land. Girls in their early teens injected with contraceptive drugs against their will; threats to take jobs away from some folks in South America who are earning 30¢ per hour—so that they can be given to others in China doing 21¢.
   I thought this was bad till a Save the Children volunteer reminded me of another plight involving children: the kidnapping of kids to force them into becoming murderers in conflict-heavy countries, particularly parts of Africa. Boys and girls are forced to become some of the 120,000-plus —other than those girls forced and beaten into sexual slavery.
   I promised the volunteer I would draw attention to this here, so please do examine these links:
Amnesty International;
Reliefweb report;
Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers;
Global Issues blog.
   The blog entry is particularly good and has further links. Choose a charity, I say, or examine which ones get most funds to the right people. If you have some links on this issue, please do post them.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Chapter One 

Stefan Engeseth’s long-awaited One: a Consumer Revolution for Business, published by Cyan, is nearing release. On his web site, the first chapter is now available for downloading. It’s an uncorrected proof—I have helped a bit to tinker it and get it looking better for its next iteration—but it should give everyone an idea of the theories that have made Stefan popular in his field in his homeland.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

EFT-POS and oil companies are evil 

My father gave me a to our American friends—coupon today that entitled me to 4¢ a litre off, for the pumps in , a suburb outside Wellington, . But, he warned me, the were unmanned, and that I should take his , which has a PIN for .
   I may blog and I may have set up one of the world’s first virtual companies, but I have never ed before. Ever. I have used an about three times in my life, and only twice did it work. I do not carry a cellphone and find them ghastly. Essentially, I do not adopt technologies for which I have to change— should change with me. It’s what it’s there for: to make human lives easier.
   So, how do the pumps of Pak ’n’ Save work for a man who has no idea, not even a clue, about EFT short of calling a bank and arranging a , or sending a PayPal payment? I would consider myself pretty smart—I have four degrees, and am very fluent when it comes to the internet—so is EFT user-friendly?
   No. First of all, Pak ’n’ Save had put up a sign. It informed customers that they would no longer receive their discounts as cash, but as extra . Problem: I did not intend to fill the car up with $20 and leave it at that. I was getting 4¢ a litre off. I’d be putting in the nozzle and going all the way.
   How was Pak ’n’ Save going to give me my extra fuel? Would a man run out from across the road, where the was located, and give the fuel to me in a can? Essentially, I took it to mean that the coupon would not be effective.
   I then read the . Perhaps being a designer (inter alia) I should have noted the point size of the type. Let’s just say it was small. If you were pumping for the first time, you would naturally read it. If your eyesight was any poorer than mine, you would not have a hope.
   I learned enough that the petrol was being supplied by the nice folks at (which makes me wonder why they could not sell it for 4¢ off per litre as a matter of course at their own place), and that these pumps were unmanned now that a trial period had finished, but there was an intercom system if I really got stuck. Apparently the trial was so successful that they didn’t people to stand around and guide folks.
   Not wishing to trouble anyone, I set about working. The trial was successful, after all, so I could borrow someone’s pet orangutan and it could use this gadget and . And I would play it by the book, because this was unfamiliar technology. I was there, anyway, and it would have cost me more to go to another to fill up there. I followed the instructions.
   ‘Insert card,’ read the digital display.
   I did.
   Nothing happened.
   I waited.
   Still nothing happened.
   So, having given up, and concluded that the whole Pak ’n’ Save coupon gag was the biggest con and they should be reported to the and that the people at BP should be brought to trial in Nigeria, I took out my card.
   The machine wheezed into life, belatedly. Remember this was quite a long time.
   It asked me to feed in the coupon code.
   On a very worn keypad, probably banged on by angry customers, I fed in the digits.
   It then asked me for Dad’s PIN. I fed that in.
   ‘Press cheque, saving or credit,’ it asked next.
   Well, I didn’t know that. I had fed in the PIN. Surely the machine could work that out? Just give me some gas, you imbecile!
   Since shouting did not seem to work and it revealed there was no midget inside the pump watching with a hidden camera, I hit ‘cheque,’ since I hear Prague is a very nice city.
   ‘Transaction declined. Printing receipt.’
   The receipt blew away since the designers of the receipt catcher did not seem to realize that is a windy city.
   I tried again. I inserted the card.
   And waited.
   Nothing happened.
   I continued waiting.
   In frustration, I took the card out, and the pump wheezed into life. I then figured out that the insertion of the card did nothing, but its removal did. Would it have been so hard for someone to have programmed that? In the days when Pak ’n’ Save was trialling this system, did no one ever complain to the attendant that an instruction of ‘Insert card’ when you actually meant ‘Remove card’ was illogical? Was the attendant under orders from Pak ’n’ Save to never report a single thing if customers got confused? Supposedly.
   This time, in case I had fed the PIN in wrong, I tried it again. Then, I wondered if Dad had got the digits mixed up as we had discussed that happening a few days ago.
   You get the picture. I tried different combinations. And got nowhere.
   Many minutes later, I drove off and searched for a to call Dad. He told me he was certain of the PIN. I went back to see if I could try other permutations.
   Having established that it was the ‘Credit’ option, all finally went well. I put in as much as the tank could hold, standing there breathing because there was no way to lock the trigger so it would pump by itself. The machine did discount the per-litre price by 4¢—so what was the notice all about? It only served to confuse.
   I pumped the gas; no man came out with extra petrol in a can. If Pak ’n’ Save asked me to deduce for myself how the machine worked, with none of their notes and small print, I might have spent less time there. Way too much information—and not good information. A case of GIGO, as we learned as kids about computing: garbage in, garbage out.
   I shall be sending Pak ’n’ Save a bill for my time. I am now addicted to . Mmm.
   And I hate and their even more after that.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

8.2.06

New Zealand’s own “extremists” 

dairy company Font Error, I mean, Fonterra, ran full-page ads in some of the Arab press to emphasize its country of origin. Fat lot of good that did after two Fairfax in New Zealand published the cartoons. Fortunately, while some trade deals are in jeopardy, -extremist protests have not called for a New Zealand (which, incidentally, would drive the New Zealand dollar down and seriously harm exports). But Kiwis should not be surprised, nor should we question why Muslims have become angry about the blaspheming of —peace be unto him, as our Muslim neighbours will add—if a ban or violence takes place.
   I can imagine it now: shops that even hint at one particular culture are . Cars from the country are damaged—never mind they are owned by locals. feel fearful, even though the majority of their nationals disagree with what has happened. Goods are banned, from toys to wine. Where did this chaos occur? Damascus? Beirut? No. New Zealand. In 1995.
   The government tested at in the mid-1990s. And instead of realizing that 75 per cent (a figure I heard then) of French people shared their views, a few took to protests. They caused criminal damage. Anti-French sentiment ran high. I attended that year’s 14e juillet celebrations in New Zealand with not a little concern. Boycotts began in the mid-1990s that held for over half a decade, in some cases.
   These folks did not publicly call for the death of François Mitterand: that was a notable distinction. But to say that the reaction of some Muslims was unexpected? Pull the other one. Doesn’t take a giant leap of imagination to go from New Zealand in 1995, with its small population, to the violence in some of the hot-spots around the world in 2006.
   Then as now, I’m not in favour of boycotts because they usually do not target the people who are responsible for an action.
   For two newspaper editors in New Zealand to sit smugly across from Muslim leaders at a meeting today and claim they meant no offence is ridiculous. Of course they meant offence, as they flexed their muscles to show their power was not waning. Today, they climbed down from their excuse. We all know the press is free: no point needed to be made here, and no public interest was served.
   One of the newspapers claims that 56 per cent were against the publication. That’s probably asking: or refraining from offending Muslims? The real question is: do you agree with the personal aggrandisement of a few editors? The percentage might rise on that.
   So they apologized, unlike TV One and Canwest’s TV3, who are finding it hard to do that. How hard is it?
   At the end of the day, we, too, have enough people among our own population who are capable of causing similar mischief. Once again, Muslims and the Anglos that make up most of the New Zealand population may have different creeds and —but, per capita, we have just as many ratbags.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Choosing between India and China 

Dr Jeremy Siegel has analysed the differences between India and China in his column, in a far less political fashion that I have being doing. However, he draws very similar conclusions to many of my earlier posts. Thanks to Peter Begley’s Business Ethics & Social Enterprise blog for the link.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

7.2.06

The winner fakes it all 

Does a contribute the original ? Stefan Engeseth thinks so, after chatting to one of the members of Waterloo, an tribute band in . American fans have approached Katja Nord (as Anni-Frid) and commented on how young she still looked, thinking her to be the original. In our conversation tonight, Stefan informed me that Waterloo’s research into the original ABBA costumes, for instance, is incredible. Like , they keep a legend fresh for new generations.
   But do such tribute bands and impersonators further the original brand? Or are they so commonplace now—Elvis and the Beatles are done time and time again—that they do little for positive ? Parodies of TV shows on, say, can’t be said to improve on their ; the difference is that many impersonators and tribute groups like Waterloo take their act incredibly seriously. Like Jim Carrey as Andy Kaufman in The Man on the Moon, they become the character.
   But depends on one thing: the name. The proprietary , in ’s parlance. These tribute bands and impersonators are like cues: they remind you of something, but this one element of the brand is not necessarily enforced. Not even for a supergroup like ABBA—who look to and other avenues for living the today.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Pimped by The Business Blog for Kiwi Creatives 

I had a great chat with Helen Baxter today. British and European colleagues may remember her name from the EU’s Knowledgeboard, where I first met her. And others might know her name from her record label, TMet Recordings, or her media company, Mohawk Media. I’m honoured that she blogged about this blog todaypimping, I believe the term is. Outside this virtual world, the last time I heard that was in the Sweeney! movie. It’s on The Business Blog for Kiwi Creatives, where there are some great entries and links for the New Zealand business person and entrepreneur—even a Podcast with yours truly. Thank you, Helen, for “pimping” this!
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Iran to publish Holocaust cartoons 

I don’t plan each day’s with a theme, but it so happens that today’s two posts mention .
   Gina Cobb posts that Iranian newspaper has launched a competition for to depict the . Remember Iran’s president is the guy going around saying the Holocaust never happened.
   I was against the publication of the cartoons in ’s , so I feel pretty secure in saying this competition is a load of garbage.
   Will groups and their allies react with and burn down Iranian embassies? Somehow, without igniting fires, the reaction might be quite different. And will the same republish these based on their high-and-mighty banner? Hamshahri might find fewer willing allies through the wire services and cartoons making fun of the Holocaust are hardly unusual in some parts of the .
   I wish the dialogue were more genuine, however. It’s certainly nicer battling things out using than literal battlefields. But the authentic voices remain the bloggers’.
   Politics aside, the guy who comes second with an idea usually doesn’t get the same attention. Anyone know what said when he got on to the moon? I don’t.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Why some resent globalization—and what we need to do 

Iran’s Mehr News agency has a few things to say about globalization today. For a like me, even I have to concede they have a point. Too much has gone on in an effort to fool nations outside the first world.
   From an outsider’s perspective, should seriously consider complying with requests if it has nothing to hide—but it is still interesting to see advanced as a reason the nation has been working on . However, I shall be interested to learn from our neighbours if they view the IAEA as an instrument of the west, out to harm them—because that, too, is worth learning about. We need to understand where the differences in our viewpoints really lie and, like so many things, I don’t think it’s in the obvious that the media and respective governments tell us about.
   On many counts the news service is right, if we leave politics aside and concentrate on its globalization message. How many times has a wonderful new principle been coopted by thinking? In recent times, some questionable firms have got on board the bandwagon. Triple-bottom-line, I am told, can be subject to trickery as much as other accounting methods. To read in an Iranian news service that its correspondent believes the west uses the globalization banner while plundering a host country’s resources does not seem to be too left-field when one considers the experiences of sweat shop workers.
   While I advocate what I call moral globalization, which almost seems naïve four years on, I also believe in cleaning our own doorsteps. And if we don’t have our faults pointed out, we may never know how we hurt others—even if listening to criticism about yourself is not the easiest thing to do. Groups such as the National Labor Committee do that well. But has anything changed?
   Each decade we say that the next will be the caring and sharing one. We actually get worse: at the end of each decade, we find out the last one has been “the ”. It shouldn’t take a crisis to spur us to act. We should be able to do that, fuelled by our own desire to live our life purpose and leave the world in better shape than how we found it.
   But the turn of this decade—this century—brought with it hope in the form of citizens being able to share their experiences. The has turned from a world of “people with diaries” to commentaries, op-eds and cutting-edge thinking. In these we share viewpoints, we criticize one another, but I hope we find out our similarities over our differences. We discover some common enemies out there—and possibly discover that the of human endeavour slows down our progress. As individuals, most of us want interactions that are mutually beneficial, without a quest for organizational power. The difference is, at least in most of the first and a good part of the second world, we have a voice. It is our task to act: we can’t leave it to those who don’t have a voice in the third world.
   So to act, I have my personal bans against companies that I think are hurting the world. I retain hope in begun on the blogosphere between regular people, even if there are some right nutters out there, too. can reveal truth.

Del.icio.us tags: globalization | global | institutionalization | dialogue | Iran | networking
Post a Comment  Links to this post

6.2.06

Quick plugs for Ronald Reagan Day 

Some quick plugs for today, February 6: since I began blogging here, I’ve met some mighty nice folks. One is Lyn Perry at Bloggin’ Outloud, who has taken it upon himself to organize a blog award. My colleague Stefan Liute was kind enough to blog about me this week, for which I am grateful.
   Finally, Stowe Boyd’s /Message blog put me on to Cocomment, which is in beta phase and requires an invitation code. To me it seems to be the sort of service that could bring more blogs together. It essentially harnesses your comments on other blogs and puts them together in one place. Services like Furl and Del.icio.us are still less than attractive graphically, but as evolves it will be interesting to see what else comes up that become the musts of this world.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Teen nature 

I haven’t had time to absorb these findings yet, but they are of interest: a summary of a study into teenagers by energyBBDO Chicago, on David Kiley’s blog. Some can be predicted: teenagers feel there is too much advertising, and there is a sense of unease. Others are useful updates to a study I made of teenagers and the youth market about four years ago. The full study is here, in PDF.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

5.2.06

The real voices of Islam: the bloggers 

My two posts about the from have been the most popular here, thanks to a boost from Der Spiegel and Guardian Unlimited, and on the web, the comments seem to be divided into two camps. There are those who are presently reasoning—Gina Cobb is one of the best exponents of this—and those who are being belligerent against , putting all Arabs and Muslims into the same category. I also have begun reading the (majority) moderate voices from and whose viewpoints run counter to those who are saying that their faith is inherently evil.
   Let us—, westerners, everyone else—step back and trace this event a little. These cartoons appeared in a (not Norwegian, as TV One last night reported in its second item) in September, in a title that hardly anyone in strongly countries read. It was pretty bad taste then, but you could still argue a . I would have been more respectful, but there are who feel the right should have been exercised. However, remember the sort of government has: it’s not exactly rosy when it comes to , with one of the more vocal parties part of its present coalition. I recall the last election campaign there where that party was quite vocal about kicking out certain ethnic groups, in statements which some nations might regard as uncivilized.
   By the time of the republication of these cartoons, we already knew what reaction it would provoke among Islam. That seemed to be gratuitous: ‘We’ll publish it because we can—and guess what? We can then report on the clashes!’
   And knowing at least one of the publications and its ’s typical behaviour in this business, I can guess that their decisions rested with a childish, gleeful rubbing of hands in wishing to create antagonism and little more. In that respect, those titles failed their to further the agenda of their readers, a point I made in an earlier post: ‘The ’s duty needs to be very similar to the wishes of citizens if we are to survive. And I sense the world would rather we have over discord, in which case we have failed to further the agenda of we supposedly serve.’ It was an act of desperation in a time when are falling. Follow the money.
   That financial agendum can be followed to a logical conclusion: a reporting on violent clashes. Thankfully in , Muslims led a peaceful protest in an exercise of their , not that it mattered to those who showed embassies being torched. I am not ignoring the fact that the violence happened, but they are not being balanced by the viewpoints of, say, Muslim bloggers.
   Some in the are serving their publics and have refrained from the images of (and I join Muslim writers in adding, peace be on him. It is a nice, respectful touch). The Guardian, for instance, felt there was no need to (linked by Ms Cobb):

It would not be appropriate, for instance, to publish an cartoon of the sort that was commonplace in Germany. Nor would we publish one which depicted black people in the way a Victorian caricature might have done. Every newspaper in the country regularly carries stories about child pornography, yet none has yet reproduced examples of such pornography as part of their coverage. Few people would argue that it is essential to an understanding of the issues that they should do so.

   Certainly in New Zealand, now guilty of republication, the appearance of the images in two newspapers served no end other than short-term gain, some massaging of their editors’ egos in a view that they effected some event (hardly the duty of a journalist), and exposure for titles that everyone knows anyway. (With respect to bloggers and readers of the Islamic faith, I will not even link them.) It has damaged the nation’s already precarious exporting record.
   What of those moderate voices? They exist in the , and it would do wonders if those of the Islam-is-evil persuasion were to search for them before blasting all of that faith. Do they know, for instance, that Al-Jazeera never broadcast any beheadings—but that it is a useful myth? I would even ask them: do they know any Muslims?
   As I commented below to a fairly civil post from one of my readers, one of my oldest friends is of the Muslim faith. Over the years I have had the pleasure of connecting with his . He is not alone among my Arab and Muslim friends and acquaintances: you’d have to live in a vacuum to not have had contact. Either they are all very good actors and they are waiting for the right time to kill me, or we in the west have a very poor understanding, post-9-11, post-July 7, of Islam—oddly enough, a charge levelled at me and Ms Cobb by a few people.
   It can be equally argued that and his conspirators were —which is exactly how the spoke of them after that awful April 19. They are hardly representative of all Christians or all . But it can be as tempting for someone in another country to draw that conclusion, just as so many have been tempted to lump all Muslims crudely into one basket.
   So where are these views? For a start, Jamal, a Muslim living in London, is one who recently linked to me. He doesn’t condone the violence, nor do numerous Arab and Muslim bloggers who are being ignored: Natasha Tynes at Mental Mayhem in Jordan (who has been following the incidents almost daily), Mahmood at Mahmood’s Den (who reckons national bans are daft), Omid Paydar in Free Thoughts on Iran (saying that dialogue would be more productive for Islam than ), and Lahoree, a Muslim living in Toronto at Hardly Innovative (who feels violence is a waste of energy). These blogs also condemned earlier , according to Global Voices, but that wouldn’t be good if we reflected a unified planet Earth with , right?
   South African Ethan Zuckerman is another gentleman who has Muslim friends, who blog, and summarizes their thoughts at his blog. (Mr Zuckerman recalls how created bias in his country’s reporting.)
   And to relieve ourselves from the intellectualizing, Steve Miller brings the whole matter down to earth (a link also provided by Gina Cobb).
   If our media don’t connect to their by providing them with , then they will die. Newspapers and their are particularly mired in uncertainty now, as pointed out in a speech last April (linked from Fulfil). Without the courage to change, the bloggers, who are more reflective of everyday views, will rule the roost.

Del.icio.us tags: Islam | Mohammed | Muslim | media | cartoons | Jyllands-Posten | branding | newspapers | Islamic | stereotypes | mainstream media | Denmark | MSM | bloggers | prejudice
Post a Comment  Links to this post

From the plane-arium 

I’ve documented with Star Trek and The Simpsons. Meanwhile, here’s one for , where you can create your own characters. It’s the way to go with : show a bit of generosity and let the public help with your , as fellow .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

To New Zealand’s Don Brash: stop counting and start absorbing 

Regular readers know I have been critical of New Zealand’s Labour government, but at the same time I wrote to the Prime Minister around May 2005, foretelling her she would win a third term. It’s not just because is a heck of a nice lady in person, but she has no credible opposition.
   People turn to the National Party not because it has a better plan, but because they see it as ideologically in tune with them, or because they want to vote Labour out of power. A change, some might argue, is needed. is low and I am dreading the fall in the dollar, because I can’t see how that helps a net-importing nation while no exporters are being properly supported.
   But life under the Opposition won’t work, either. They have given every indication that they are party of economic geeks, which is well and good for some. But New Zealanders are still sore from the changes of the 1980s and 1990s, and in that context, Clark’s leanings tend to feel more familiar, less inhuman.
   The won’t succeed because they constantly ignore the one thing New Zealanders like being valued on: . And, if you want to trace that back to its roots, the New Zealand .
   That is one of innovation, independence and inspiration—and a lot of other I words—and it includes, as part of its mix, an appreciation of the culture.
   All I sense from the Leader of the Opposition, Dr , is a series of mixed signals. Dr Brash is a former governor of the Reserve Bank, so it is only natural he steers his conversations to economics, an area in which he feels comfortable. He and I largely agree on the notion that the Minister of Finance has mismanaged the growth of the . But I am not sure that his economic discussion takes into account the .
   I have heard little about how the culture is to be built upon, and how programmes might be funded. Hard questions endear only the initiés, not everyday New Zealanders. And that is where he has not won the “hearts and minds”—he may be the most sensible, economically minded leader out there, but politicians need more than intelligence. (Thus, Shadow Finance Minister , as his stands now, is not the answer for the Opposition’s leadership.) Speaking out against Māori, in terms of abolishing their seats, might appeal to white New Zealand, but in the absence of an alternative (e.g. integrating later, Anglo cultures with Māori culture, acknowledgement of in everything from currency to street signs, an acceptance of Māori models and structures of governance to run alongside the surprisingly dominant ones), Māori should rightly balk at their suggestion.
    should not be aimed at the majority, because that says you are counting votes and treating people like numbers. Speeches should be aimed at the heart and soul of what a nation stands for, and in Opposition, you have a lot more time to think about it, and a greater luxury to say it. This is what does well—you can debate all you like whether he means it or not, and whether the reality lives up to the promise. But he knows he only reaches half of the electorate, and hopes that his thoughts on ‘America’ sift through to enough members of the other half.
   For Brash and National, this will take some training in what the nation brand stands for. National has already done the research. But if it is to stand a chance at the next election, it needs to connect to what this nation means, not just what the party means. And it needs to integrate this sincerely and wholly into its thinking, because it is something the Prime Minister has been able to do rather well in her first two terms—and might again master in her third.

Del.icio.us tags: New Zealand | politics | economics | nation branding | culture
Post a Comment  Links to this post

4.2.06

Trying to get a decent feed 

A quick note to readers getting this blog via RSS or Atom: I have set Blogger to supply this blog’s feeds in full, but it sometimes, by itself, opts to provide edited ones. Please know this is not to do with me—it’s a glitch with Blogger.
   If you go into Blogger’s help pages, this fault is actually under the ‘Resolved issues’ category!
   I can only suggest reloading to see if it will provide a new feed, but I will notify Blogger in the meantime. (Your own enquiries there would be helpful, too.)
Post a Comment  Links to this post

The discontent over globalization 

My 50th post here—though I have lost count of the number of blog posts in total. (I do know that I posted the 500th at the Beyond Branding Blog.) And it’s a brief one, though poignant, as it refer to a post that addresses (partly) why has so many upset: failing to state what is actually needed.
   I also think a lack of is to blame. By all means, shift some jobs overseas—but have something for your own people.
   A lot of ’s growth was due to the by a or to provide by law. Thus, if a job was to be moved abroad, then the corporation needed to innovate and create something that could make use of the home country’s .
   Some may say that that led to corporations, and Korea has since changed its law—from what I recall under dubious circumstances. The result, nevertheless, is that Koreans can fire people like most western can.
   But seems to be doing all right. It’s just shown a very flash at the Detroit Auto Show, with 19 speakers, room for 4,000 songs on its hard drive, and an eight-speed automatic gearbox—a real leap ahead. There’s a promise of a model—an even bigger leap for a full-size luxury car.
   The car might look as dull as dishwater, but the business model is clear: the Lexus will be made in , where the company can be assured of its quality, and Toyota is quite happy to shift production of lesser models to plants nearer their customers, in Red China, India and the Czech Republic. Just like Fiat did, once upon a time.
   This is not clever or new stuff, but it keeps a company growing. is necessary sometimes, but I wonder if it’s as often as -pushed companies make out in order to keep high.
   The old ‘Japan can do it’ lesson is still there to be relearned. Never mind the early days were and to Japan is still a tough thing to do. There are areas where we can absorb the lessons without letting go of the ideals that many economies live with.
   If we had kept innovating at the pace we were expected to in the 1960s, we might just have wound up with that futuristic of the more optimistic films then. I am being a little facetious, but let’s face it: a car built in 2006 is not as big a leap over one made in 1986, as that car was a leap over one made in 1966. And it’s far easier to write about the solutions than to implement them.
   However, we do need to start thinking of others: companies on the are there not just for stock holder gains, but for the betterment of their communities. When they win, we all win, through the multiplier effect alone—and who cares if the short-term price is down if there’s a clear, long-term path that you know will work out? Watch your instinct before you watch the tickers.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

3.2.06

The Mohammed cartoons—and what they say about western civilization 

Gina Cobb posted her thoughts on the cartoons about and the effects of their republication at her blog. I responded with the following, which may be worth repeating here. This is further to my post yesterday on the topic, which has been the most-read piece on this blog to date. (Marvin was a gentleman who had a contrary viewpoint on her blog.)

I agree with Gina. This is not wholly about and allowing others to come in and gag us. This is about the fact that in the age of , we are all for our culture, and a horrible job we are doing of that. rely on a sense of decorum and respect. These messages, of taking a stab at a stereotypical way, could have easily been achieved by illustrations of, say, Arafat or various al-Qaeda members. I would argue, looking at other cartoons (including some I was referred to that really made some distasteful comparisons between the President, Prime Minister Sharon, Hitler and Satan) that most cartoonists would take stabs at people, not their beliefs. There is a happy medium to be found here—just as there is some sense of refrain on that they don’t cuss before a certain hour.
   We would be wrong to analyse this issue through western eyes, saying that if we are OK with funny about that the Muslims ought to be cool with jokes about Mohammed. Once upon a time—we only need to look back 75 years—we, too, would have been offended as a culture with images of Jesus in a cartoon. This does not make the Muslims and Arabs 75 years behind us—but this should be something borne in mind on why the Danish newspaper and the republications have caused offence.
   If we are proud of our western heritage and freedoms, then we should act like it. and are marked by the human abilities to refrain from acting like animals, and respecting and codes. The was certainly capable of doing so during its heyday of the mid-20th century, its finest hour, although I reserve judgement on its racial record at that point; and ’s greatest period of , the Sung Dynasty, was marked with the same sense of civilization and pride. Nations that retain that sense enjoy —and also .
   As Gina says in her original post, the west has made some great gains in the freedoms that you talk about, Marvin. And we did this without insulting their beliefs. Indeed, we did this while respecting them—and showed those who might sympathize with the that that was better. Now we are reversing those gains and losing a fight of ‘hearts and minds’, as the President might put it.
   Relations between are like relations between people. Just as I don’t expect, on my first meeting with Marvin, to be punched in the face by him, the Islamic world doesn’t expect to get a black eye from a cartoonist in a commentary. Marvin would tolerate my making a joke about him, probably, but I expect if I bring his mother’s sex life into it, then I’ve got a kick in the teeth coming (whether physical or in sense). Same thing here, except most Muslims seem to find this far more grave than a quip about a parent’s private habits—this strikes at something very dear and precious to them, and, as Gina says, we should be having , not alienation, with the .


Del.icio.us tags: Mohammed | Islam | Muslim | Arab | media | civilization | censorship | culture | freedom of the press | culture clash
Post a Comment  Links to this post

A how-to guide to insulting Islam 

I have a lot of sympathy right now for and who were offended by the publication of cartoons mocking . It’s another example of : as if the that published them, , didn’t anticipate this reaction.
   As a owner, I keep a careful eye on this sort of thing. When we ran a picture of Gov Schwarzenegger in one issue of Lucire, I made sure the Democrats had someone: we ran a photo of former governor, Gray Davis, in the same issue. While it’s not always one-to-one, I am sensitive—as I know how politicized some of our readers might be. Some people are anal enough to keep count.
   That’s just over mere politics. Now we are dealing with something far deeper, more meaningful.
   It is a shame that this foolishness on behalf of Jyllands-Posten has made expatriates in the uncomfortable—and some are distancing themselves from their homeland’s behaviour. The government has refused to intervene, which says very little about its understanding of .
   I would have let this stand, as there are enough bloggers dealing with it. But for this: now other media are publishing the cartoons. Why? One newspaper’s actions might seem to be foolish, but now this just seems malicious: no one can claim ignorance on how offended Muslims can be through blaspheming their prophet. And yet so many in the west like to portray as an intolerant . What hypocrites these media are, with their prejudices.
   This is far worse than the cartoons that were published in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, with Chinese in pigtails and Russians in Bolshevik costumes, being made a mockery. Then, it was just about other races. This time, it is about the holiest figure in a religion, short of Allah Himself.
   The publications have served to unite Arabs and Muslims around the world. It’s a pity that a lack of respect for them and their most sacred beliefs will lead to disunity between them and western Europe.
   The media’s needs to be very similar to the wishes of citizens if we are to survive. And I sense would rather we have over discord, in which case we have failed to further the we supposedly serve.

Del.icio.us tags: Islam | Muslim | Arab | media | newspaper | blasphemy
Post a Comment  Links to this post

How to stop the matrix resetting itself 

When we talk about , I occasionally think about history, because we have been here before. The last great era of globalization was at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries, and one company that rode that wave was Singer, who got its into most of the world. I imagine still use some Singers.
   But the last time we had globalization, we still wound up trying to kill each other in . Now we still maintain the idea that will conquer all—after all, that was the same theory behind the and the .
   If we aren’t that much smarter as creatures this time round, what makes us think we’ll avoid annilhating ourselves?
   It might pay to examine why we wound up corrupting the last time. Then, it was and : companies wanted to make use of their trade to line their pockets. Familiar enough. In some cases, it was about supplying things the other nation did not want: forcing to accept , rather than silver, for example. Now it’s about paying workers 25 cents an hour—if that. Countries built their empires to support , distancing themselves from the individual voices that were being trampled on. The rise of wasn’t about an ideology: it was about creating a voice that could be heard against the . These days we choose to ignore folks dying of diseases that are curable, but the isn’t there to help them.
   I support the idea of one planet, one people (shall we abbreviate this 1P1P?)—I love the idea that someone in Syria might be my neighbour because the internet makes that all possible. And Skype, and even cheaper air travel. Globalization—if it weren’t such a word shamed by WTO protesters—would be my mantra.
   I would imagine most people feel the same way: that there is no harm in thinking of someone in another country as a fellow human being. The first thaw in the probably happened not with or , but with Phil Donahue, hosting a show where he connected, via satellite, everyday people from the and the Soviet Union, in their respective nations’ studios. One Russian said, ‘I would like to come over there and shake your hand.’ And we realized our “enemy” was much rather like us.
   Wherever you go, there is a version of “the ”, whether you’re in Washington state or in the Palestinian territories. Everyone just wants to feel fulfilled and do their part in life.
   So what can be different? What can we do so we don’t reset the Matrix and wind up 100 years behind our time?
   This time, most of us have a voice. The internet, in the west at least, has been the great leveller. It might even become that in some régimes where it is gradually expanding: , , . But it is up to the west to make the first move, to set a pattern about the ’s usage, since we’ve had it longer.
   In my earlier post I offered the notion that the was a reflection of the real one, with the same concerns. But why does it have to be? Why not create, with Web 2·0, a world where the promise of a single planet can be fulfilled and not wait till Web 3·0 or when we start another war?
   Through the web, we can unite individual buyers and sellers and , breaking them out of the state structures that have so far prevented them from contacting and benefiting one another.
   While we are still bound by the laws of each nation, we can begin with very simple tasks. Merely contacting someone else and offering help would be a start. Forming groups using the web—nothing new, mind you—is another thing we can do. But the difference I am writing about is an attitudinal one: for the time being we are making one-on-one changes. However, if each of us sees each connection as one for our , can the changes become greater?
   For instance, most of you reading this blog will have a contact in a foreign country, probably, say, through LinkedIn. We have, for instance, an idea for a business that we might already be doing in our nation. How about this: why not give them the same techniques and see where they wind up? Don’t charge them a until they are on their own two feet, and then make it a reasonable percentage.
   My friend Denis Kenward, whom I met when interviewing him for , just flew off to to teach artisans on two -affected islands his techniques for doing made from shells. Right now, the Indians have the machinery but do not know how to use them in order to create the effects on Denis’s pieces. Instead, they are doing each piece by hand and spending a day. Denis has gone to show them how he makes his works in 10 minutes.
   The man is getting next to nothing financially but the reward must be huge. I don’t think he’s going to be after a royalty, but it is a small, internet-initiated event that can help a lot of people. Sure he had hassles with his visa: that is the real-world element. But the virtual world had the venture all mapped out first, and the just snapped into place. Intention and reality.
   The cynics might fear that the country receiving the intelligence will use it against the originator, but are these nations as selfish and immoral as that? Nine times out of ten—if not 95 out of 100— given is trust returned. We need to be secure about ourselves. We all want cooperation, not suspicion. And the world might just become a better place as a result of that.

Del.icio.us tags: globalization | globalism | philanthropy | free trade | commerce | karma | internet | web | networking
Post a Comment  Links to this post

2.2.06

Googling Jesus Christ, communist style 

I’ve seen comparisons between regular and Google.cn on searches for the cult and Tiananmen Square, but not —until I came across the Sharon Hughes blog in the United States. According to Sharon, regular Google turns up 168,000 references in the images’ section, versus 10 in Red China.
   Remember that is, contrary to common belief, officially recognized in , according to its own constitution. But it seems the normally soulless is concerned about someone whom a spirit-less Communist would consider died 2,000 years ago.
   Controversial few days here: politics and now religion!
   I commented on the topic last week (see here), and my opinion of Google hasn’t changed hugely. But I have had to revise my estimation of the Politburo downwards, as I can’t see the threat of the Church toward its -leaning members. They always seem to run scared from something.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Counterpoint: Al Qaeda is weakening 

Although I say that ’s is typical of a becoming more mature, the Yale Center for the Study of Globalization has published an article to say that this is a sign of weakness. Author Fawaz A. Gerges says that Al Qaeda is a skeleton of its former self: ‘Now bin Laden and al-Zawahiri focus primarily on providing spiritual inspiration and overall to jihadist factions.’
   Nevertheless, he offers some advice to the : it should not rest on its laurels. The side of the war has proved a disaster. I can understand that: the has distanced itself from its former of generosity. Claims of freedom run counter to the —whether you agree with the legislation or not, it has an .
   While those two examples are mine, click through to the article here.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

What’s brown, yellow and Kiwi? 

If you ever needed evidence that was coming into its own as a distinct from the Empah, then the current by —which, once upon a time, was a New Zealand-started and owned drink—is a reminder of earlier times. That time is the , with L&P’s brown and yellow being the height of ; people now look back through rose-coloured glasses at summer days from 30 years back, drinking the distinctively Kiwi drink and eating .
   Coke has tied in some radio stations into the campaign but it is essentially an evocative one—not unlike Huffer T-shirts from a few years ago that use the 1974 ’ logo.
   The country is not “all together” yet— aren’t sorted, and the lack of recognition of the language in everyday life is laughable—but it’s an automatic human trait to ignore the worries of the past and remember only the good things. In which case the L&P campaign is a sure winner.
   Never mind that it lacks verisimilitude—the logo in the 1970s had a harsher, egyptian —looking to the past is an easy strategy to take. The campaign itself isn’t innovative—though it attempts to rope together radio and internet and some individual participation (shoot yourself digitally enjoying fish and chips and drinking L&P)—but it is significant from that greater cultural perspective. This is to a what an image of a black cab is to a Londoner, and it has not happened in any great way before. It is, of course, aided by the fact that the 1970s can easily be memorialized thanks to colour TV footage—it seems all that more real and close, wide lapels and bad hair aside.
   New Zealand isn’t, after all, just about Hobbits and yachting and the . The down side to such campaigns—that New Zealand was a cool and happenin’ place in the 1970s—is that it all too easily trivializes a .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

1.2.06

The reinvention of marketing: one simple idea 

Found via Joseph Jaffe’s blog, Bob Liodice of the ANA addressed the reinvention of marketing yesterday. In it, he acknowledges the power of in raising , and how elements such as are no longer as much of a given since have competitive information.
   I hold on to the old models of leading to equity, but Mr Liodice is right that needs to be heavily considered in modern . He suggests, at the top of his list, that need to be reinvented in the face of a ‘consumer-controlled, constantly changing marketing ’.
   I wouldn’t go so far as to say the environment changes so much that the model has to be reinvented, but a simple respect of the audience and its power will result in a healthier model, no matter what. Realizing that chief brand officers—a term I think was coined by Chris Macrae—are only stewards, rather than deciders, of a brand’s meaning is part of that, and creating models that respect and accommodate consumer views is the fundamental difference between Branding 1956 and Branding 2006.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

The language of life 



Thanks to the support of others who linked me, rather than any genius of my own, this blog now has the same number of readers as the old Beyond Branding Blog (and it’s still growing). Thanks to Blogflux, I can see where readers are coming from (roughly); and the above is interesting.
   It shows, roughly, where the with good internet connections are. You’ll notice a divide between countries in Europe which have dubbed programmes and those with —the latter are comfortable with . has a lot of blog readers.
   Brazil is the most wired nation in South America—and that is evident from the map, even it’s just one hit.
   Lebanon, South Africa, India, Thailand, the Philippines, South Korea and Hong Kong have brought forth visitors—the Hong Kong visitor is apparently from my old neighbourhood of Ho Man Tin. You would expect there or people who are well versed in English. Meanwhile, nations of the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States, Australia (on the coast) and New Zealand (including myself) are well represented.
   Some of my ideas about helping people in poorer countries presume a of English, but judging from this map, is that realistic? We really need people who can bridge the divide ( and ) and identify the most active and vocal members of the communities we target helping. Therefore, we need to meet many of these groups half-way by at least learning a part of their if we are sincere about raising their and closing the rich–poor gap.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Beyond the State of the Union ’06 

The ’s speech has already been published online, at Think Progress. As expected, President Bush cements his decision to not opt for an early withdrawal of from Iraq, and hits back at suggestions to the contrary:

Yet there is a difference between responsible criticism that aims for success, and that refuses to acknowledge anything but failure. Hindsight alone is not wisdom. And second-guessing is not a strategy.
   With so much in the balance, those of us in public office have a duty to speak with candour. A sudden withdrawal of our forces from would abandon our Iraqi allies to death and prison, put men like and Zarqawi in charge of a strategic country, and show that a pledge from America means little. Members of Congress: however we feel about the decisions and debates of the past, our nation has only one option. We must keep our word, defeat our enemies, and stand behind the American military in its vital mission.


   This remains a touchy subject in a nation as politicized as the . The gave an excellent interview to David Frost not long ago, essentially stating something that if you want peace, sometimes you must wage war. She stressed that her husband was opposed to war—but that it can be a necessity for the greater good.
   I took quite a strict interpretation of resolution 1441 at the at the time the US was debating to go to war—but whatever one’s political bent, America is involved. So what should America do?
   A pledge needs to be carried out. History is littered with broken promises from the , and I would like to see it not break this one—for the of the country. The United States has won friends in the past not because it has pursued policies: anti-American sentiment was high during President Carter’s administration down here; pro-American sentiment was high during World War II and in the years after it. President made friends internationally while defying the UN Security Council in 1995 (Bosnia), 1998 (Iraq) and 1999 (Kosovo), with much of the public here remembering him as a leader.
   Why? Was it because the was in its nature, wanting to help the world—even if it encountered hiccups along the way? Businesses came on board with a wish to work with other cultures, not really seeing the borders. I remember being sensitive, even caring, in their quest to form alliances. They had learned the lesson of falling behind Japan in productivity and —the late 1980s and early 1990s were a period of growth in the US’s business maturity: many business books written during that time has a conciliatory, international outlook. And they were years I was introduced to dealing with the United States.
   The did not start out with this aim, but circumstances have compelled it to and to have a more robust than the President might have indicated during his 2000 campaign. But it has found itself at this point in 2006, having to repeat the events of as its justification, and is in desperate need to the war as one of freedom and liberty.
   It might be, and it might not be. I am interested in , but probably not enough to manage a debate on this blog this week. But from where I sit, the only course open to President Bush—or if I were in his shoes, with the same pressures—is to keep pledges made publicly to the United States’ Iraqi allies. In my book, that means staying the course.
   There are good reasons not to do this. A trillion-dollar is no cause for celebration. It offends my —I suppose libertarian (not ) by western standards—nature. Americans may feel domestic problems are more pressing, and George W. Bush is the president of the United States, not of other territories. There is no immediately foreseeable harm to having a date for withdrawal, even as a target. And it is extremely hard to see why security in a foreign land can mean economic and societal prosperity in the US. Or so the arguments go: for each one there is an equally impassioned argument to the contrary.
   Others will argue that the deficit is a necessary evil for the time being while the country is waging . That if the United States sorts out a foreign problem, it will lead to greater security at home. That a simply gives a target date to regroup and to take over territories from which the US is departing. That the United States had no choice but to be involved in war after being attacked on September 11, 2001: foreigners made the US a global policeman, not the United States and not the President.
   So in the midst of these conflicting arguments, I believe the job of a leader is to . If the President says that to an outsider is the order of the day—for the sake of this argument I conveniently ignore areas where things are less clear—I can see American companies wanting to build bridges with others in foreign countries.
   This happened 10 to 15 years ago, and I enjoyed it. I enjoyed the and the new models I cooked up with American partners in business, where we had equal input. I enjoyed the presumption that we were equals in a deal. This happened when the President’s father and President Clinton were in office: a Republican and a Democrat.
   But of late, dealing with American businesses has been difficult. People talking big and not following through. Others adopting positions. being eroded.
   Many Americans I speak to regret how business has taken a tumble. They, too, notice it in dealings with their own compatriots.
   Haven’t I just shot my own argument in the foot? If the President is so high and mighty, surely I wouldn’t have these troubles working with his nationals?
   Here is where I see the example being set and the message being communicated as being two different things, and this is where the problem actually lies.
   A few years ago, I submitted some research to the on branding. I offered the viewpoint that the US needed to have a unified , and that the work of Ms Charlotte Beers at the time was insufficient (or, at best, it needed more resources). This was a bit before became as active as he is today in , but it was at a time when I felt sure that Dr would be asked to be Secretary of State in President Bush’s second term (yes, I predicted he would win).
   I do not recall in depth the actual brand that I proposed to Dr Rice, but I touched on the disunity between the White House and the messages actually getting out of the country. Most relied on the US’s outlets, which have been shown to be biased, most recently at a university in a liberal state.
   The have created disunity, and that in turn affects the public. The fuelling of one has meant that the public perceives a tyrant for a president, if they rely on the programmes. Surprisingly, ’s show on , blasted by some as being right-wing, has been found to be one of the most balanced; as has Gannett’s USA Today newspaper. However, not every American turns to these news sources. And not every American can believe the President when he says the is strong, or that he is keeping in check.
   So what can one do? Side with the and spread the cheer in the hope that that will balance the ? Or simply be more selective about what we read, watch and listen to?
   Or do we, too, stand out here with our own example and hope we can lead?
   Maybe this is why the bloggers are rising and the need a rethink.
   And, I would even venture, actually supporting the President on some of his more ideas, especially ones we can agree on. If we can start with where we agree, we can create dialogue in areas where we disagree.
   Taking Iraq aside, there are positions which I believe even President Clinton would be happy to endorse:

We must also change how we power our . We will increase our research in better batteries for and electric cars, and in -free cars that run on . We will also fund additional research in cutting-edge methods of producing ethanol, not just from corn but from wood chips, stalks, or switch grass. Our goal is to make this new kind of ethanol practical and competitive within six years. Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach another great goal: to replace more than 75 per cent of our imports from the by 2025. By applying the talent and technology of America, this country can dramatically improve our environment, move beyond a petroleum-based economy, and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past. …
   Yet the destination of is determined by human action, and every great movement of history comes to a point of choosing. could have accepted peace at the cost of disunity and continued slavery. could have stopped at Birmingham or at Selma, and achieved only half a victory over segregation. The United States could have accepted the permanent division of Europe, and been complicit in the oppression of others. Today, having come far in our own historical journey, we must decide: will we turn back, or finish well?


   I say, as , let’s work with the United States on the areas that better all our lives. And even get the nation thinking of becoming not just less oil-dependent, but moving away from fossil fuels altogether.

Del.icio.us tags: George W. Bush | State of the Union | war on terror | Osama bin Laden | USA | politics | nation branding | media bias | liberal media | mainstream media | alternative fuels | fossil fuels
Post a Comment  Links to this post

The BB is sleeping 

With one post shy of 600, I gave the Beyond Branding Blog the coup de grâce today. It’s not dead, but it is now an of selected BB authors’ work.
   It wasn’t easy. For those of you who began reading my because of the BBB, you’ll know that from May 2005, I was there regularly. Prior to mid-2005 I was a one-post-a-quarter guy. Then I caught the bug.
   I recall one post from another blogger saying, not in these exact words, that the BBB had lost a bit of its loving feeling prior to my starting. Maybe that was true: most of the who were there regularly had gone off to their own blogs—Johnnie Moore is perhaps the best known among us. And we found greater and flexibility in our own spaces. And Johnnie told me recently that just prior to my going “on duty” at the BBB, he had planned to shut it down.
   It had become, after all, less of a , and the rise in the BBB’s ranking of late had really been down to me. So in mid-January I posed the question: are you coming to read me, or coming to read Chris Macrae, the other blogger there regularly? I resisted time and time again to start my own, which Johnnie had encouraged me to do (once in mid-2005, and again when he called me over the holidays).
   I had good reason to be suspicious. My experience in the early years of blogging was that it attracted idiots with very little to say—something that had changed a lot since 2003. Jessica Cutler might have changed all that as she made blogging : there is gold in gossip, and there are people wanting the low-down on low-brow. One acquaintance, Ellen Simonetti, was fired from for, inter alia, keeping a blog. A sad reflection of our society, so maybe it was time for me to have my space. To put back some optimism into the virtual world. But I do justify ex post facto.
   After encouraging messages and one phone call, I decided to depart and admit that Johnnie’s way was right after all. Chris, as some of you know, has many blogs, so his participation wasn’t for want of an outlet. Evidently he felt that BBB readers deserved to know of his other networks and his concerns, and, nobly, kept up his writings there.
   However, when it is a blog run by one person, it is no longer collaborative, and that, to me, seemed to be a terrible breach of a promise we make each time someone buys a copy of Beyond Branding. We tell them they can continue the dialogue on our blog. But technology comes to the aid of our promise: by aggregating individual authors, we at least provide the right flavour, and when I looked at the BBB today, apart from my messages announcing the changes, it actually began to have the flavour of the first month we were online.
   Using Feed Digest, which Johnnie had signed up to earlier, four blogs were chosen—I’ve just added Ton Zijlstra’s as a trial. The Feed Digest admin has been particularly helpful in testing the Atom and RSS feeds for us.
   Now we are all blogging independently, and doing so freely. We are no longer tempering our posts to suit other authors’. But the odd thing is that the passion seems to have returned. It’s this passion, not or rigid , that seems to drive sites like Ohmynews.com so well. I hope the loving feeling is back—and that that will be useful to those Beyond Branding readers who wanted to extend their reading.
Post a Comment  Links to this post

 

 

Note

Entries from 2006 to the end of 2009 were done on the Blogger service. As of January 1, 2010, this blog has shifted to a Wordpress installation, with the latest posts here.
   With Blogger ceasing to support FTP publishing on May 1, I have decided to turn these older pages in to an archive, so you will no longer be able to enter comments. However, you can comment on entries posted after January 1, 2010.


Quick links

Surf to the online edition of Lucire
  • More ramblings at the Lucire Insider blog
  • The Medinge Group
  • Jack Yan for Mayor
  • My Facebook page
  • Follow me on Twitter
  • My Vkontakte page
  • Book me for public speaking
  • Contact JY&A Consulting on business projects
  • Check out fonts from JY&A Fonts
  • Add feeds




    Add feed to Bloglines
    More options after the ad



    Subscribe in Rojo
    Add to Google
    Add feed to Newsgator
    Subscribe using Netvibes
    Add feed to My Yahoo!





    Add to Bitty Browser
    Add to The Free Dictionary
    Add to Plusmo
    Add to Excite MIX
    Add to netomat Hub
    Add to flurry
    Add to Webwag
    Add to Attensa
    Receive IM, Email or Mobile alerts.


    RSS feed from 2RSS
    CompleteRSS
    Feedster
    CoComment feed
    ATOM for coComment

    Twitter Updates


  • Get this blog via email

    Enter your Email


    Powered by FeedBlitz
    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Technorati

    Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
    » View my Technorati favourites

    Individual JY&A and Medinge Group blogs

  • Lucire: Insider
  • Summer Rayne Oakes
  • The Medinge Group press room
  • Detective Marketing
  • Amanda van Kuppevelt
  • Delineate Brandhouse
  • Paolo Vanossi
  • Nigel Dunn
  • Pameladevi Govinda
  • Endless Road
  • Avidiva news
  • Johnnie Moore’s Weblog
  • Steal This Brand Too
  • The Beyond Branding Blog
  • Ton’s Interdependent Thoughts
  • Partum Intelligendo
  • Right Side up
  • Headshift
  • Goiaba Brazilian Music
  • Jack Yan on Tumblr (brief addenda)

  • + Add The Persuader Blog to your Blogroll

     
    Check out the Jack Yan: the Persuader Blog swicki at eurekster.com

    Blogroll

    Design Can Change

    No Spec

    Mapstats


    Del.icio.us


    Previous posts

  • The old blog is still here
  • My last post for this blog on Blogger (fingers cros...
  • History of the decade, part 11: man and woman of t...
  • Why Peter Jackson deserves a knighthood
  • History of the decade, part 10: 2009
  • The newer the program, the buggier it gets: a remi...
  • Any how-tos on shifting to Wordpress?
  • History of the decade, part 9: 2008
  • Research isn’t that important if you write in an e...
  • We are running out of time

  • This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

    Archives

  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009


  • Earlier entries at the Beyond Branding Blog
  • August 2003
  • September 2003
  • October 2003
  • November 2003
  • December 2003
  • January 2004
  • February 2004
  • March 2004
  • April 2004
  • May 2004
  • June 2004
  • July 2004
  • August 2004
  • September 2004
  • October 2004
  • November 2004
  • December 2004
  • January 2005
  • February 2005
  • March 2005
  • April 2005
  • May 2005
  • June 2005
  • July 2005
  • August 2005
  • September 2005
  • October 2005
  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006

  • Donate

    If you wish to help with my hosting costs, please feel free to donate.