One thing I love about New Zealand is that weāre not mired in an election cycle years before the event. Weāre three weeks or so out from our General Election, and only now am I feeling things are heating up.
Itās not that we havenāt had drama. Weeks ago, Metiria Turei was co-leader of the Greens, Andrew Little led Labour, and Peter Dunne was aiming for another term as MP for ÅhÄriu and leader of United Future. None of these hold true in late August.
What is unusual is that Iām undecided because of all these late changes, and we’re still learning about policies in some casesāI remember getting my manifesto out six months before an election, and the uncertainty here isn’t helping. The billboards have done nothing to sway me one way or another. Policy-wise, I have some things in common with each of the parties, excepting ACT, though probably like most New Zealanders, I haven’t had a chance to visit all the parties’ websites yet, though I will in the next few weeks. Various websites helping people decide based on stated policy actually give very different answers: On the Fence suggests I am both a National and Labour supporter (I often kid and say the parties are the same, just plus or minus 10 per cent); yet taken earlier, it said United Future and MÄori Party were the top two with the most in common with me. Vote Compass gives Green and Mana. The websites, then, are no help, because they base their answers on selected issues, and apparently Iām both right- and left-wing.
Twitter is comparatively quiet in 2017, giving fewer clues about how candidates are thinking, and I hardly look at my Facebook (for obvious reasons). I have spied some of the TVCs, where Labour has done an excellent job, and (last I looked) National has uploaded only one to its YouTube channel, so I canāt even see the first one that has been on telly. A lack of coordination between online and traditional media worries me.
Itās an odd mix, none of whom really stand out.
The incumbent National Party currently has an unimaginative TVC that is an adaptation of the rowers of 2014, and it only serves to highlight that, after three terms, they are out of touch. Say what you will about the former PM, the Rt Hon John Key, he had a pretty keen sense of the electorate. Not so this National Party, where the Deputy PM gave this quote:
I see my friend Andy Boreham suggests āMinsterā is a misspelling of āMonsterā, but such a point makes a mockery of New Zealandersā belief (even if it does not hold true with growing inequality) that being Deputy PM is no greater a duty or more important a job than being a union leader. Some might have voted for National before on the premise that John Key is rich (Iām sure that worked for Trump, too), but, as we know, they arenāt going to return the favour of a vote by giving up a share of their wealth with you. PM Bill English, whom I first met while he was Treasurer in 1999, is an intelligent man with a sense of humour that doesnāt come across on television, and that wonāt hold him in good stead this time out. Pity: there are many National MPs I like (e.g. Paul Foster-Bell, Simon OāConnor). The Natsā 2002 campaign with Bill as leader was a disaster: I saw no outdoor advertising when I came back from Europe. This time thereās a lot of outdoor, but none of it says anything to me, other than National has spent some money licensing new fonts. I should note that no one has won an election for a long, long time in this country using a typeface that has a single-storey lowercase a.
Labour has staged a turnaround like no other, one where leader Jacinda Ardern is neck in neck with the PM on one preferred prime minister poll. I had dismissed Labour earlier on as a party with unhealable divisions, but the speed at which Ardern and her party have pulled together an overhauled campaign is to be commended. Iāve never voted Labour before, and Iām still not convinced that the divisions are gone, but I will say this of Ardern, just as I once did of myself when I stood for office in my 30s: if we screw it up, we have a lot, lot longer to live with the consequences. She will take this seriously. She has had more parliamentary experience at this point than Key when he first got to the PMās office, and former PM Helen Clark has endorsed her. Rose-coloured glasses about the Clark administration will help, even if I was critical of certain aspects of it back then. Post-Little, Labour could get more Chinese New Zealanders voting for them, too, after an earlier screw-up with a real estate agentās list that was handled horribly. Chinese NZers have long memories, and some labelled the gaffe racist. Ardern is a departure from Little and the message here is āDonāt hinder Jacinda.ā
Peter Dunneās decision not to stand in ÅhÄriu means that the United Future party is at an end. Itās a shame, because I have always got on with Peter, and he has been generous to me with his time, more so than my own MP. Similarly, the Greensā James Shaw I count as a friend of over seven years, but the Turei scandal has left the party hurt, even if its policies remain on track. The signage has been appallingly dull, bereft of imagination, even if Jamesās performance in a recent Nation debate clearly marks him out as the intellectual, aware of global trends. If we want a globalist (or at least a globally aware MP) in Parliament, then we could do far worse than ensuring the Greens get in above the 5 per cent threshold. Strategically, a party that has its origins in the environment (even if that message hasnāt been hammered home of late) makes sense, as I believe we need to protect ours desperately. Vote Compass says Iāve most in common with the Greens this time out, and Toby Morris makes a good point with his latest cartoon.
The Opportunities Party has some good pointsāIām in favour of closing tax loopholes for foreign companies operating on our shoresāand its leader, Gareth Morgan, who normally comes across as lacking the common touch, did well in the debate, at least when he had something to say. Iāve followed Morgan on Twitter for some time, long before this political foray, and often liked what he had to say. However, at either website TOP and I donāt have that much in common.
The MÄori Party, as my supposed second choice based on On the Fence (at least the first time out a few weeks ago), could have received my vote after Peter decided not to stand, but Marama Foxās performance in the above debate didnāt impress me, even if she impressed all the talking heads in the studio. It goes to show how different things are in person. Fox has passion and fire, but didnāt have the figures to back up her policiesāand I know from having been on the podium with my opponents that you should have them, and your researchers should have at least come up with an estimate. I donāt know where Mana sits; I had a far better idea when Kim Dotcom was involved.
New Zealand First, helmed by the Rt Hon Winston Peters, the most establishment of all the politicians who successfully carries on an antiestablishment message, has signage up with Petersā face and the words āHad enough?ā On that note I find accord with New Zealand Firstās message. I have had enough of Winston Peters, and I answer their advertisement in the affirmative. But I shanāt be voting for them.