Now we are on the new server, here are March 2022âs imagesâaides-mĂ©moires, photos of interest, and miscellaneous items. I append to this gallery through the month.
Posts tagged ‘Australia’
March 2022 gallery
28.03.2022
Tags: 1960s, 1965, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2016, 2022, Abercrombie & Fitch, actress, advertisement, Aston Martin, Australia, BL, BMC, car, celebrity, Citroën, design, employment, fashion, film, Ford, France, humour, Instagram, James Bond, Lucire, Lucire KSA, magazine, marketing, Mini, music, Nissan, photography, PSA, publishing, Renault, sexism, South Africa, TV, Twitter, typography, UK, USA
Posted in cars, culture, design, France, gallery, humour, marketing, media, publishing, TV, typography, UK, USA | No Comments »
January 2022 gallery
01.01.2022Here are January 2022âs imagesâaides-mĂ©moires, photos of interest, and miscellaneous items. I append to this gallery through the month.
Notes
More on the Ford Falcon (XA) in Autocade. Reposted from Twitter.
TaupĆ Plimmerton summer sunset, photographed by me.
BBC parody news item, via Twitter.
More on the Wolseley on Autocade.
More on the Mitsubishi Colt Galant at Autocade.
Dodge 1500 advertisement via George Cochrane on Twitter.
Model Alexa Breit in a bikini, via Instagram.
More on the Renault 17 in Autocade.
More on the Renault 20 in Autocade.
More on the Renault MĂ©gane IV in Autocade.
âSign not in use’ posted by John on Twitter.
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RTX3050Ti, at Asus’s Singapore website.
Pizza Express Woking parody still, via Twitter.
Tags: 1960s, 1965, 1970s, 1971, 1975, 1976, 2020, 2020s, 2022, advertisement, airline, Aotearoa, Argentina, Asus, Australia, Autocade, Autocar, BBC, BL, British Leyland, car, Chrysler, computing, Dodge, electric cars, England, film, Ford, Germany, humour, Instagram, James Bond, Japan, marketing, media, Mitsubishi, modelling, New Zealand, news, parody, photography, Plimmerton, Porirua, Renault, retro, Taiwan, Twitter, UK, USA, Wellington
Posted in cars, gallery, humour, interests, internet, marketing, media, New Zealand, politics, UK, USA, Wellington | No Comments »
Afterpay wants my account details (even though I don’t have an account) to investigate its own activity
19.10.2021Usual story: go into the Facebook advertising preferences, spot organizations that Iâve never dealt with somehow possessing private information about me that theyâve uploaded to Facebook.
One noticeable one was Afterpay, both its Australian office (no reply on Twitter) and the âAfterpay USA Business Managerâ (the US office did reply).
@AfterpayUSA I donât even know you people so how come you are uploading private information about me to Facebook? pic.twitter.com/awmNTX3TAA
— Jack Yan çç”æ© (@jackyan) October 15, 2021
Iâve never had an Afterpay account. Iâve seen their TV commercials. One of the Lucire crew attended Australian Fashion Week, although I registered him before Afterpay became a sponsor. So how does this company have my details? How does anyone?
The US office asked me to go into DMs on Twitter. And as this is (a) public policy and (b) their replies look copied-and-pasted, I doubt I am breaching any confidences here.
My first DM:
Hi folks, I donât know if I can tell you any more than what was in the Tweet.
Somehow you have my private information and according to Facebook you uploaded it to their site for your marketing purposes.
Iâve never dealt with you so how you have any info on me is a mystery.
Obviously it would be nice to get me off your lists and off Facebook.
Their first reply was this. From here you can already tell they didnât read my first message.
Hi Jack,
We would love to investigate this for you.
Before we do, we need to verify your identity to protect the privacy of your account.
Can you please confirm:* Your full name
* The mobile phone number registered to your account
* The address registered to your account
* Date of Birth
* Email registered to your accountPolite reminder: It is essential you maintain the personal information we hold on our systems – this means keeping things like your current mobile number and email address updated, and updating your home residential address when you move home.
We collect and handle personal data in accordance with our Privacy Policy (afterpay.com/en-au/privacy-âŠ).Thank you,
My reply:
Hi there, thatâs the thing, I donât have an account with you, so you shouldnât have any of this. Could you please just search for my name and delete anything tied to it? I can only assume youâve bought someone elseâs list.
Obviously Iâve seen you in TV commercials and to my knowledge thatâs the sum total of our contact.
The next one was positive:
Sure! I can search your name to see if you have an account with us.
That’s your full name?
Me:
Thank you, and yes!
I wonât have an account though, and if I do, thatâll be pretty suspicious since Iâve never signed up âŠ
This morning, we were back to square one:
I would love to investigate this for you.
Before we do, we need to verify your identity to protect the privacy of your account.
Can you please confirm:Your full name
The mobile phone number registered to your account
The address registered to your account
Email registered to your accountThanks,
Three minutes later:
Hey Jack,
Without verifying your identity in order to protect the privacy of your account, we can not provide any account details.
If you don’t want to provide any requested information via this chat, you can email us or give us a call to discuss this matter directly.
Please contact us via +1855 289 6014 or use the link below to email us:
help.afterpay.com/hc/en-us/articâŠ
I hope this was helpful! Please feel free to reply to this chat if you have any further question or concern.Have a great day,
You can tell what Iâm thinking here:
We are going around in circles here. I donât have an account so how can I provide information tied to an account? Can you please explain how you would do this?
Please see your message at 1.47 p.m. GMT. You said you would use my full name, which you have, to see if I have an account with you. What was the result of that?
Iâm betting you came up blank âŠ
I tried their link and none of the options really apply here.
We know that an unethical US-owned company operating in Australia did once obtain my private information through Lumino, the dentistry franchise, and I accordingly kicked up a big stink about it. And as Afterpay is Australian, are they somehow connected?
Updates since original post
Afterpay, October 20, 1.33 p.m. GMT:
Upon further investigation, I was not able to match your name: Jack Yan to any Afterpay account.
Have a good day,
It took two days for them to realize this, despite my saying so from the beginning. My response:
Thank you, this is what the original Tweet was about. Itâs precisely that I donât have any relationship with Afterpay that makes this perplexing.
Now that weâre on the same page, hopefully you can finally start dealing with my original Tweet.
What I asked there was: why you have uploaded private information about me to Facebook? Thatâs what theyâre claimingâboth you and your Australian head office did so over a two-day period.
This means you must have some info about me and as I do not have an account with you, I would like to know how you got it.
And as Facebook claims you have uploaded it to their platform, I would like you to remove it from both their and your databases.
Trust me, if this was routine, where I could have just used your FAQs and your website, I would have done so.
I’ve yet to hear from [email protected] over this matter but I only contacted them today.
Since they have obstructed for two days it makes you wonder what they’re hiding. Over in Australia they’ve already done this:
Afterpay accessing electoral roll data under laws designed to target terrorism, money laundering
Can I have a #wetoldyouso? This kind of scope creep was always going to happen, it was only ever a question of when. #privacy #auspolhttps://t.co/seFwTYfArW
— Liam Pomfret, PhD (@LiamPomfret) January 24, 2019
Finally, some progress (sort of), at 4.30 p.m.:
Thank you for your patience
We have reviewed your request to erase your personal data. The right to erase only applies to a customer who has an account with Afterpay. As we believe none of these circumstances apply to your situation, we have not option to upload private information to Facebook nor we can do if you had an account with Afterpay.
You can read more about the purposes we use personal data for in our privacy policy afterpay.com/en-CA/privacy-âŠ
Please let me know if I can assist in any other way.
Not a full answer but my feeling is that this is as far as things can go with their US office. If I don’t hear from their Australian head office in a week, I’ll get in touch with our Privacy Commissioner. I know, Facebook lies, but on those earlier occasions when I chased up firms who had done this, the honest ones took my details off. (One less honest one denied it happened but then my details disappeared!)
My final DM for now:
Thank you. The privacy policy probably allows for uploads to business partnersâI had read it when you first sent me the linkâso you are technically covered should an upload have taken place, but I appreciate your going as far as you can in this thread.
Tags: 2021, advertising, Australia, Facebook, law, privacy, social media, Twitter, USA
Posted in business, internet, technology, USA | No Comments »
October 2021 gallery
01.10.2021Here are October 2021âs imagesâaides-mĂ©moires, photos of interest, and miscellaneous items. I append to this gallery through the month. Might have to be our Instagram replacement!
Notes
Chrysler’s finest? The 300M rates as one of my favourites.
The original cast of Hustle, one of my favourite 2000s series.
Boris Johnson ‘wage growth’ quotationâwhat matters to a eugenicist isn’t human life, after all. Reposted from Twitter.
For our wonderful niece Esme, a Lego airport set. It is an uncle and aunt’s duty to get decent Lego. My parents got me a great set (Lego 40) when I was six, so getting one at four is a real treat!
Publicity still of Barbara Bach in The Spy Who Loved Me. Reposted from Twitter.
Koala reposted from Twitter.
Photostat of an advertisement in a 1989 issue of the London Review of Books, which my friend Philip’s father lent me. I copied a bunch of pages for some homework. I have since reused a lot of the backs of those pages, but for some reason this 1989 layout intrigued me. It’s very period.
Fiat brochure for Belgium, 1970, with the 128 taking pride of place, and looking far more modern than lesser models in the range.
John Lewis Christmas 2016 parody ad still, reposted from Twitter.
More on the Triumph Mk II at Autocade. Reposted from Car Brochure Addict on Twitter.
The origins of the Lucire trade mark, as told to Amanda’s cousin in an email.
More on the Kenmeri Nissan Skyline at Autocade.
Renault Talisman interior and exterior for the facelifted model.
The original 1971 Lamborghini Countach LP500 by Bertone show car. Read more in Lucire.
More on the Audi A2 in Autocade.
Tags: 1960s, 1967, 1970, 1970s, 1971, 1977, 1980s, 1989, 2000, 2000s, 2014, 2016, 2019, 2020, 2021, actors, actress, advertisement, advertising, Alarm fĂŒr Cobra 11: die Autobahnpolizei, Audi, Audrey Hepburn, Australia, Autocade, BBC, Belgium, Bertone, Boris Johnson, British Leyland, car, celebrity, China, Chrysler, COVID-19, design, email, England, Eon Productions, family, Fiat, film, friends, futurism, GenĂšve, Germany, graphic design, high-tech, Hong Kong, humour, Hustle, Italy, James Bond, JY&A Media, Lamborghini, law, Lego, London Review of Books, Lucire, Marcello Gandini, marketing, media, Nissan, parody, politics, Red China, Renault, retro, RTL, science fiction, Scotland, Switzerland, technology, toy, trade mark, Triumph, TV, Twitter, typography, UK, USA, Volkswagen
Posted in cars, China, culture, design, gallery, Hong Kong, humour, interests, marketing, media, politics, TV, UK, USA | No Comments »
Putting on the breaks
20.06.2021Being self-employed my whole adult life, I havenât exactly been let go from actual employment, but there have been some gigs, paid and unpaid, that came to an end without me expecting it.
Iâve never been sore about losing them, but I donât agree with the way they were done.
Gig 1. Did a quarterly task for these folks, which soon became a monthly one. Lasted 14 years and was either the longest-serving or second-longest-serving in that capacity. Let go in a group email.
Gig 2. Voluntary one, told that I wouldnât be needed because the organization was going in a new direction. I wouldnât be replaced because of this new format. Found out later that there was no new format and I was replaced. Would it have hurt to tell the truth? After all, I replaced the previous person, and I would have been fine with them needing a fresh face. Itâs not as though I made any money off them!
Gig 3. Another voluntary one. Hadnât heard anything but then I usually didnât till pretty late in the game. Except this time I had to chase them up, given how late things got. When do you need me? Found out I was replaced and that the decision had been made months earlier. I was the last to know. Offered some inconsequential consolation, but no apology. Ironically this happened as my influence in this particular area grew substantially overseas, so the help I could have given them was immense, so bad luck and bad timing to that mob. Bridges burned.
Iâve let a few people go in the pastâone had so many allegations against him (theft, sexual harassment) that with hindsight I wonder why we took so long. Given the anonymous (and ineffective and illogical) letters heâs sent to some of my most loyal colleagues, I think heâs still sore. Others had to be let go when the financial winds blew against us. But Iâm pretty sure they all knew why.
The only mysterious one from our companies was one person who claimed I cut him off and stopped using his writing services. It was a complete lieâhe just vanished. At one point we re-established contact. We agreed to put it down to an email glitch (although this person regularly phoned me and stopped doing so, but in the interests of moving on, I let it go). Years later, he did it againâjust disappeared. He told a mutual friend of ours the same lie, that I ceased to have anything to do with him. I relayed the above story to that friend but I could see she didnât believe meâtill he did it to her a few years later!
Tags: 2010, 2010s, 2019, Aotearoa, Australia, business, JY&A Media, Lucire, Miromoda, New Zealand, publishing, transparency, USA
Posted in business, New Zealand, publishing, USA | No Comments »
June 2021 gallery
01.06.2021Here are June 2021âs imagesâaides-mĂ©moires, photos of interest, and miscellaneous items. I append to this gallery through the month.
Sources
The Guardian letter, from Twitter.
Ford Cortina Mk II pick-up made by Hyundai, referred by ê°ëì° on Twitter.
Ikea water, reposted from Twitter.
Alexa launch, reposted from Twitter.
Protest Sportswear’s women’s range for springâsummer 2021. Read more at Lucire.
Collusion between Google and Facebook, from Bob Hoffman’s The Ad Contrarian newsletter.
Ford Falcon ESP limited editionâa familiar image to those of us who read Australian car magazines in the early 1980s. More on the Ford Falcon (XD) at Autocade.
This was the famous advertisement for the 1965 Ford Mustang, for its dĂ©but in April 1964 at the World’s Fair in New York. It was mentioned in Lee Iacocca’s autobiography, but I had not seen it till 2020.
Dido Harding work history, shared by James O’Brien on Twitter, possibly from The Eye.
Tags: 1960s, 1964, 1965, 1980s, 1982, 2010s, 2012, 2021, advertisement, advertising, Amazon, art, Australia, Bali, Big Tech, Boris Johnson, car, cartoon, celebrity, collusion, Donald Trump, Facebook, fashion, Ford, Google, Hawaiâi, history, humour, Hyundai, Instagram, Korea, language, licensing, Lucire, McKinsey & Co., Netherlands, New York, newspaper, NewTumbl, NY, oligopoly, politics, retro, technology, The Guardian, Twitter, UK, USA
Posted in cars, design, gallery, humour, internet, media, politics, publishing, technology, UK, USA | No Comments »
Reduced Facebook? Australia is the lucky country
18.02.2021Whichever side you are on with Facebook imposing a ban on Australians sharing news content, this says it all about the level of intelligence over at Menlo Park.
In Australia, Facebook has not only de-platformed legitimate governmental bodies and non-profits, it has de-platformed itself.
Maybe taxing these companies would have been easier, and the proposed legislation isn’t perfect, but I think most people see through Facebook’s rather pathetic tactics.
It’s crying foul, saying it would have invested in local media in Australia, but won’t any more. But since Facebook lies about everything, I’ve no reason to believe they ever would have helped media organizations anywhere.
And notice how quickly it was able to shut off pages, and remove an entire country’s ability to share newsâyet it still struggles with removing fake content about COVID-19, extremist content and groups, bots, videos of massacres, and incitement of genocide and insurrection. It has struggled for years.
We all know that Facebook can do as it wishes with a singular eye on its bottom line. It doesn’t want to pay Australian publishers, so it quickly acts to shut off what Australians can do. But fake content and all the restâthat makes them money, so it doesn’t act at all, other than issuing some empty PR statements.
We all see through it, and this is probably the best thing it could have done. If people spend less time on its stress-inducing platforms, they will be healthier. And returning Facebook to what it was around 2008 when we shared what we were doing, not what the newsmedia were reporting, is really a plus.
It’s a splendid own goal that benefits Australians, who will ingeniously find solutions pretty quickly, whether it’s telling their friends about articles via email (which is what I used to do pre-social media), finding alternative services, or, not that I advocate this, resorting to outright piracy by pasting the entire article as a Facebook status update. No news in your feed? There are services for that, like going straight to the sources, or using a news aggregator (if you don’t like Google News, the Murdoch Press actually has one in beta, called Knewz. Who would have guessed that the only organization that stepped up to my half-decade-old demand for a Google News rival would be Murdochs?).
I doubt New Zealand will have the courage to follow suit, even though last year I wrote to the Minister of Communications to ask him to consider it.
PS.: Removing all Australian media is easy, but removing anti-vaccine pages is hard.
Tags: 2021, Australia, deception, Facebook, media, Murdoch Press, news, News Corporation, politics, social media
Posted in business, internet, media, politics, technology, USA | No Comments »
Like communist dictatorships, Google and Facebook threaten Australia
23.01.2021You know the US tech giants have way too much power, unencumbered by their own government and their own countryâs laws, when they think they can strong-arm another nation.
From Reuter:
Alphabet Incâs Google said on Friday it would block its search engine in Australia if the government proceeds with a new code that would force it and Facebook Inc to pay media companies for the right to use their content.
Fine, then piss off. If Australia wants to enact laws that you canât operate with, because youâre used to getting your own way and donât like sharing the US$40,000 million youâve made each year off the backs of othersâ hard work, then just go. Iâve always said people would find alternatives to Google services in less than 24 hours, and while I appreciate its index is larger and it handles search terms well, the spying and the monopolistic tactics are not a worthwhile trade-off.
I know Google supporters are saying that the Australian policy favours the Murdoch Press, and I agree that the bar that the ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission) has set for what qualifies as a media business (revenues of over A$150,000 per annum) is too high. So it isnât perfect.
The fact Google has made a deal in France suggests it is possible, when the giant doesnât whine so damned much.
Plus, Google and Facebook have been dangerous to democracy, and should have done more for years to address these issues. Theyâve allowed a power imbalance for the sake of their own profits, so paying for newsâeffectively a licensing payment that the rest of us would have to fork outâat least puts a value on it, given how it benefits the two sites. No search? Fine, letâs have more ethical actors reap the rewards of fairer, âunbubbledâ searches, because at least there would be a societal benefit from it, and since they arenât cashing in on the mediaâs work, Iâm happy for them to get a free licence to republish. Right now I donât believe the likes of Duck Duck Go are dominant enough (far from it) to raise the attention of Australian regulators.
Facebookâs reaction has been similar: they would block Australians from sharing links to news. Again, not a bad idea; maybe people will stop using a platform used to incite hate and violence to get their bubbled news items. Facebook, please go ahead and carry out your threat. If it cuts down on people using your siteâor, indeed, returns them to using it for the original purpose most of us signed up for, which was to keep in touch with friendsâthen we all win. (Not that Iâd be back for anything but the limited set of activities I do today. Zuckâs rich enough.)
A statement provided to me and other members of the media from the Open Markets Instituteâs executive director Barry Lynn reads:
Today Google and Facebook proved in dramatic fashion that they pose existential threats to the worldâs democracies. The two corporations are exploiting their monopoly control over essential communications to extort, bully, and cow a free people. In doing so, Google and Facebook are acting similarly to China, which in recent months has used trade embargoes to punish Australians for standing up for democratic values and open fact-based debate. These autocratic actions show why Americans across the political spectrum must work together to break the power that Google, Facebook, and Amazon wield over our news and communications, and over our political debate. They show why citizens of all democracies must work together to build a communications infrastructure safe for all democracies in the 21st Century.
Considering Google had worked on a search engine that would comply with Communist Chinese censorship, and Facebook has been a tool to incite genocide, then the comparison to a non-democratic country is valid.
So, I say to these Big Tech players, pull out. This is the best tech “disruption” we can hope for. Youâre both heading into irrelevance, and Australia has had the balls to do what your home countryâfrom which you offshore a great deal of your moneyâcannot, for all the lobbyists you employ. You favour big firms over independents, and the once level playing field that existed on the internet has been worsened by you. The Silicon Valley spirit, of entrepreneurship, born of the counterculture, needs to return, and right now youâre both standing in the way: you are âthe manâ, suppressing entrepreneurial activity, reducing employment, and splitting people apartâjust what dictatorial rĂ©gimes do.
As an aside, the EU is also cracking down on Big Tech as it invites the CEOs of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Alphabet (Googleâs parent company) to a February 1 hearing. Theyâve bled people for long enough and itâs time for some pushback.
Tags: 2020, 2021, ACCC, Australia, Big Tech, China, democracy, Duck Duck Go, employment, entrepreneurship, EU, Facebook, Google, law, licensing, media, Murdoch Press, publishing, Red China, unemployment
Posted in business, China, culture, internet, media, politics, publishing, technology, USA | 1 Comment »
January 2021 gallery
01.01.2021Let’s kick off January’s images right here!
Click here for all months (or hit ‘Gallery’ at the top of the screen, if you’re on the desktop), here for December, and here for November. This post explains why I wound up doing the gallery here.
I append to this entry through the month.
Sources
Changan Uni-T, more at Autocade.
Cartoon from Textile Cartoons on NewTumbl.
Twenty seventeen newspaper clipping with Donald Trump from The Herald.
BMW image from Kolbenkopp on Twitter (more at this post).
Bestune B70 Mk III, more at Autocade.
Bridal gown by Luna Novias, and featured in Lucire.
Citroën AX-330 advertisement from 1970 sourced from here.
Chilean Peugeot 404 advertisement sourced from here.
Ford US full line from 1972 from Consumer Guide.
Xpeng P7, more at Autocade.
More on the Lancia Beta Monte-Carlo in Autocade.
Clarins model from the Lucire archives.
Ford Cortina Mk III by Hyundai advertisement from the Car Factoids on Twitter.
Tags: 1970, 1970s, 1972, 1974, 1975, 1980s, 1986, 2000s, 2005, 2017, 2020s, 2021, advertising, Aotearoa, Australia, Autocade, beauty, Bestune, BMW, Brexit, car, Changan, Chile, China, Citroën, Clarins, fashion, FAW, Fiat, Ford, Germany, humour, Hyundai, Italy, Jacinda Ardern, Korea, Lancia, Lucire, magazine, marketing, modelling, New Zealand, newspaper, Peugeot, politics, retro, Scotland, Stern, technology, The Herald, Twitter, UK, USA, Xpeng
Posted in cars, China, gallery, humour, New Zealand, politics, technology, UK, USA | No Comments »